Should any vaccines be required for children?
Debate Rounds (3)
P2- "According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, most childhood vaccines are 90 to 99% effective in preventing disease". http://pediatrics.aappublications.org... . This makes children safer because children must have proof of being vaccinated before entering the public school system; most children start their schooling at young ages as well as beginning to develop their social skills with other kids. So why jeopardize the safety of other children?
C- Vaccines should be required for all children.
P2) there are only a few diseases that need mandatory vaccination due to the high level of death associated with these diseases, they include, mumps, measles, rubella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio and in some cases tuberculosis . If there happen to be no vaccination for these highly contagious, very deadly diseases then the world as we know it would be a real life series of "The Walking Dead". However, any vaccination for the treatment of an illness (hardly a life threatening disease) is simply unnecessary and just another way for the government to control us by fear.(www.cdc.gov)
C) We should not be required to vaccinate our children.
P2- Your second premise is unclear because you state that these vaccines are mandatory but then contradict yourself by making a walking dead reference stating that if no vaccines existed in the world. Look at Gardasil that"s not a mandatory vaccination but it was created to help protect against 4 types of HPV. "Women 9 to 26 are protected from 2 types of HPV that cause 75% of cervical cancer cases and two more types that cause 90% of genital warts; and in Boys 9 to 26 Gardasil helps protect them against 90% of genital warts". http://www.gardasil.com.... This seems like a rather useful vaccine in protecting kids who are reaching maturity and have begun experimenting in sexual activates.
P3- According to a 2003 report by researchers at the Pediatric Academic Society, childhood vaccinations in the U.S prevents about 10.5 million cases of infectious illness and 33,000 deaths per year.
C- Vaccines would be highly beneficial for the well being of all children.
P2) There is no test to find out a person"s "HPV status." Also, there is no approved HPV test to find HPV. If there is no way to tell if the disease is present then there is no need to be vaccinated. HPV is contracted by negligence in sexual relationships. If one chooses to be negligent with their health and doesn't feel it is necessary to protect them self at all costs especially when having intercourse with a complete stranger then maybe they deserve to have contracted HPV. Maybe they'll think twice next time. A vaccination is not going to prevent HPV. There is no guarantee and If you catch it you catch it. No wonder they make you sign waivers waiving government responsibility prior to the shot. Nobody knows how a certain individual will react and that alone is scary. This is yet another form of control by our government in order to have a say in every aspect of our lives. (www.webmd.com)
P3) That statistic is immaterial. It is over a decade old and proves nothing because those 33,000 deaths were made up for in other areas pertaining to our governments influence on pushing vaccinations. What about all the people who were used as guinea pigs to test these new foreign vaccinations? No body ever hears what happens to them, it cannot possibly be that they came out with these new vaccination without having tested its safety and effectiveness first. But we only hear the good and satisfying reactions and never the whole truth, therefore these results cannot exist because they are incomplete.
C) We should not be required to vaccinate.
http://www.cdc.gov... . Children commonly need medical care because of the influenza virus, especially before they turn 5 years old; also Children with chronic health problems like asthma, diabetes and disorders of the brain or nervous system are at especially high risk of developing serious flu complications. Children should not have to suffer the symptoms of chicken pox once in their lives; why put kids through extreme itching, and high fevers for a week"s time? Especially when the virus lives within your body for the rest of your life and could develop into shingles which is by far much worse.
P2- The papillomavirus (HPV) can be tested by screenings; such as Pap test which helps to find pre cancer, cell changes on the cervix that could form into cervical cancer. The HPV test checks for the virus within the body. If other HPV symptoms were to occur then your doctor would be the best person in determining the fact. You don"t have to have intercourse with a complete Stanger to catch an HPV some people are unfortunate and born with it especially males who unknowingly carry a sex related gene that is only activated once it is inside the woman; this can cause the woman to suffer from extreme medical conditions that could alter her health in a negative way. http://www.thehpvtest.com...
P3- As terrible as the government may seem no person is treated as a guinea pig or forced against their will to be test subjects for the accuracy of vaccines. They all willingly consent to take part in the research.
C- Vaccines will ultimately lead to the well being and safety of children.
P2) HPV can not be detected, if HPV does happens to show up it is in the form of cancer which means the virus has already progressed itself further into the body and developed more seriously. When HPV is contracted there is no way to tell. Vaccines are unnecessary for such STD's being that there is no way to prevent an STD unless one protects them self entirely. There are no guarantees in this life and there is no guarantee this harmful substance e being injected into our bodies will actually help to cure us. Know before hand, the only true preventer of HPV is ourself, no vaccine required. Again these vaccinations are injections of the virus we wish to protect ourself against and scientifically have no absolute guarantee.(www.cdc.gov)
P3) the ones being tested on for these horrible injections are actually prison mates who are forced against there will to be the experimental guinea pigs for these vaccines. By bribes and false promises and behind closed doors, the government does test on human subjects and a lot of this is kept under wraps for liability issues. The government is not going to tell us average folk about their experimentations with humans because they do not want to create hysteria. When these experiments are done secretly there is no way for future injection receivers of vaccines to know what is really going on.
C) vaccines should not be required.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by JMCika 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the better argument. I am surprised that Con didn't argue the risk for allergic reactions leading to a risk of death for those vaccinated.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.