The Instigator
Sani
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
Altushaaa
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Should children be taught sex education at school?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Sani
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/15/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 748 times Debate No: 37752
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Sani

Pro

Sex education is one of the most important subjects at school. There are two main reasons. The first and main reason is - teenagers will know how can they avoid serious problems as: unpredictable pregnancy or even worth thing catching viruses. In my opinion, with adding this subject to the school program, we can help to teens to understand that all their intim actions could entrance problems in their future.
The second reason is - to help teens to understand the construction of their body. For today's day some teens still do not know abything about their body. However this subject should be separated because the majority of students could be very embarrased and will not contact with teacher.
Altushaaa

Con

Sex education is bad, because it can make children vulgar
Debate Round No. 1
Sani

Pro

It is much better to know something important rather from your friends, or even from people, who think 'they know everything about it'. Teens could not be vulgar If they know the ways of protection or growing up
Altushaaa

Con

It's better to know about sex from your parents than from teacher who usually don't even care about their students
Debate Round No. 2
Sani

Pro

I am absolutely disagree with you. The purpose of teacher is to help to children to know something. Some parents could be very shy to talk about 'sex' or some 'embarassing' thing for them or even some of them do not know the answers to the questions which could contain questions about growing up, like 'these days'. In my opinion, for avoiding these situations, the government should add sex education. It could be best solution of decreasing the number of teen abortions in our country, teen pregnancy and having a lot of undesirable babys.
Altushaaa

Con

Because of sex education children will know everything about adults life and relationship. It will affect on their psychology and they will want to try everything what adults do
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DeFool 3 years ago
DeFool
SaniAltushaaaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: These two accounts seem to have joined on the same day, found one another, launched and accepted this debate... and one of them did not present a single argument. No forum posts, no opinions, no profiles, no other activity. This certainly makes a cynic suspicious. Arguments to the PRO account.
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 3 years ago
RoyLatham
SaniAltushaaaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides asserted their views of what would happen without providing any references to support the truth of their claims. Pro implied that the status quo is that sex education is taught, and con did not deny that it is taught. Therefore Con had the burden of proof to show that a change should be made. Con's lack of evidence thus loses arguments. Neither side had very good S&G; at least run the spell checker -- the spell check box is at the bottom of the submissions page. There is no conduct penalty; conduct is only for disrespecting the opponent. Insulting teachers or sources or whatever is allowed.
Vote Placed by PatriotPerson 3 years ago
PatriotPerson
SaniAltushaaaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Agreements to Pro before and tied after. Conduct to Pro because Con had an insult toward teachers. S&G is tied because neither of their's was too swell. Arguments to Pro because he had a stronger, more solid case. Sources are tied as none were provided.