The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Should classrooms have class pets?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2015 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,911 times Debate No: 74657
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




Classes should have class pets because taking care of one will teach responsibility, respect for living animals, and give a sense of interdependence. If the pet dies the events and mourning that come after will teach the children life and the life cycle. The pet could also be example for learning that would make it fun to learn.


Pets should not be kept in a class. According to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, around 15% of children have pet allergies. This means that in any given class of 20 students, statistically 3 of them should have some sort of pet allergy. Additionally, animals can be disruptive. With constant shuffling around and natural animal noises, it can be distracting and pull children away from their learning. Caged animals such as rodents, the kind most likely to be seen in a classroom setting, need frequent cleaning. Some of these animals, such as guinea pigs, may need cleaning up to 3 times a week. If not, they begin to smell, not to mention cause hygiene problems. This not only can create an unpleasant atmosphere, but also takes class time away to ensure the animal is properly cleaned. From experience, I can tell you that cleaning rodent cages is quite a dirty task, always involving urine and fecal matter. It is also relatively expensive to keep a caged animal. Bedding alone can cost $20 a month. Some animals can exceed $1000 per yearly cost. This may not seem to be much on the surface, but the money has to come from somewhere. With at least 35 US States cutting their education budgets, there isn't a lot of room for additional expenses. Children could learn just as much responsibility, if not more, from owning their own pets. In fact, in 2012, 62% of households did, in fact, own a pet. With such a high percentage of pet ownership, taking school funds, infringing on class time, and risking kids with allergies to own a class pet is a redundant task that does not need to be done.

Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Lots of excellent analysis from Con! I'd have been more interested in the ethics of keeping pets in general, but nice work on those practical concerns! I find the allergies particularly convincing. That being said, Con, you did neglect some of Pro's points on education. You might have pointed out that keeping animals in cages and watching them die is teaching them inappropriate lessons about dominance and exploitation, as well as bad lessons on acquiring scientific knowledge at others' expense. Owning pets could have been easily turned, if there were more rounds, for the reasons you mentioned--not all families have the time, money, or ability to care for a pet, and thus a public pet would be more necessary. A stronger stance against the exploitation of animals for others' amusement and "education" I think would have been a more powerful argument. However, don't let my criticism get you down! You did a great job!