The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
4 Points

Should customs be legal in Smash 4?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/21/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 704 times Debate No: 77982
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




I think that customs should be allowed in tournaments because they give the game more diversity and make some weaker characters stronger like wii fit trainer or palutena


Since my opponent hasn't defined anything, I will define a few things.


strong: having great physical power and ability

weak: having little physical power or ability

think: to believe that something is true, that a particular situation exists, that something will happen, etc.

legal: allowed by the law or by the rules in a game

Currently my opponent hasn't proved anything because he "thinks" that customs in tournaments give more diversity and make weaker characters stronger.

Customs should not be legal in Smash 4 because they can make characters who many people already consider "strang," even stronger. This can lead to unbalanced fights when playing with a random character.

In tournaments this can also be a problem because sometimes when you fight a custom character you are not used to some of the moves they use. This can lead to trouble because it is hard to predict what move is coming next. In tournaments this can be boring because rounds can be fast and unexciting. Often the more exciting matches happen when there is a level playing field.

Because characters can become too powerful and tournaments could be unexciting, customs shouldn't be legal in Super Smash Brothers 4.


[1] Merriam-Webster (
[2] Merriam-Webster (
[3] Merriam-Webster (
[4] Merriam-Webster (
Debate Round No. 1


mikemostan forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


mikemostan forfeited this round.


Extend...Vote Con
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hayd 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments to Con for actually arguing as Pro made no arguments and conduct to Con for not forfeiting.