The Instigator
PillarOfSalt
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
RevNge
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points

Should debate.org stop making people have 3 debates until they can vote?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
RevNge
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/24/2014 Category: Technology
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 560 times Debate No: 63895
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (8)
Votes (5)

 

PillarOfSalt

Con

I don't think you should have to make 3 debates to be able to vote. This is sort of restricting who can and can't vote. I understand that only people who like to debate will vote and this will deter trolls, but 3 is too much and I believe it should be shortened.
RevNge

Pro

The topic of this debate is: "Should debate.org stop making people have 3 debates until they can vote?"
As Pro, I should argue that the prerequisite of the three debates is not necessary, and as Con, he should be arguing that they are necessary.

Con has conceded to the side of Pro. Unless he makes an argument in favor of the three-debate limit, Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 1
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by Adam_Godzilla 2 years ago
Adam_Godzilla
I +1 this
Posted by Adam_Godzilla 2 years ago
Adam_Godzilla
Conduct to you however ;)
Posted by Adam_Godzilla 2 years ago
Adam_Godzilla
I dont know man. Doesnt seem like a debate that deserves a winner . . . Alright, whateves, at times like this there is only one thing to do. Tie!
Posted by notyourbusiness 2 years ago
notyourbusiness
Wow, there is nothing to debate/see in only one round...
Posted by RevNge 2 years ago
RevNge
And actually, I didn't know it was only one round. XD
Posted by RevNge 2 years ago
RevNge
Aw, come on...I WAS the contender, after all. If this was just "make people have three debates before voting," Con would be Pro, and as the instigator, he has full BoP. Also, he just stated his opinion and didn't use any logic or evidence. -.-
Posted by Adam_Godzilla 2 years ago
Adam_Godzilla
Sorry Rev. I vote fairly.
Posted by ESocialBookworm 2 years ago
ESocialBookworm
Technically... it's a question but...
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by TrasguTravieso 2 years ago
TrasguTravieso
PillarOfSaltRevNgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Noob snipe.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
PillarOfSaltRevNgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: con took wrong side
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
PillarOfSaltRevNgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession
Vote Placed by Adam_Godzilla 2 years ago
Adam_Godzilla
PillarOfSaltRevNgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Im awarding conduct to Pro. Neither side made arguments. Spelling and sources are tied. Good job! A vey deep thought provoking debate indeed.
Vote Placed by Zanomi3 2 years ago
Zanomi3
PillarOfSaltRevNgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I disagree with the previous vote for two reasons. A) It matters not if Pro was trolling a noob or not, his side was argued for. B) Pro is not quite required to present arguments because his arguments were already stated by Con. There is no need to refute anything, and the only arguments in the entire debate were for Pro's side, regardless of who presented them. Spelling, Sources, and Conduct were all even.