The Instigator
Blakec97
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
nickmigs
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points

Should debating be allowed in school

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Blakec97
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/16/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 460 times Debate No: 67116
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

Blakec97

Con

Debating is actually mad stupid it shouldn't even be a thing because you will never change someone's opinion so why debate just have a nice speech to people to share your view
nickmigs

Pro

You may say its stupid, but you sir are the stupid one. You are ignorant and feel that nobody's opinion can be changed. Somebody's opinion can be changed on the flip of a coin. All you need is a good argument and put some facts out there to change the persons mind. Don't be so narrow minded and look at it from both sides guy.
Debate Round No. 1
Blakec97

Con

Listen big tough guy just because you go to tro doesn't mean you can make fun of me. School is a place for learning not arguing and everyone should see everyone views on topics I believe that it should be illegal to voice anything in school their isn't ant controversy
nickmigs

Pro

Okay so you just contradicted yourself by saying that. I don't think any further arguing is required because I just made you look like the little girl you are. Now go take a seat, go clean your fake Jordan's, and accept defeat. Your welcome for showing you what losing is and I hope you enjoy it.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by CooCooClockofDoom 2 years ago
CooCooClockofDoom
I will have you know I am a mass debater and I have changed many people's minds
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by gomergcc 2 years ago
gomergcc
Blakec97nickmigsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a weak argument but at least it was a argument. Pro just insulted Con with out any real argument.
Vote Placed by Eli01 2 years ago
Eli01
Blakec97nickmigsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: This was a bad debate, and both parties need to join a debate class. Conduct to CON, because PRO was obnoxious.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
Blakec97nickmigsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Both of you guys need to put more effort into your arguments, so I won't award any argument points. Con does get conduct because pro was a jerk, though.
Vote Placed by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
Blakec97nickmigsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro makes sense
Vote Placed by Valkrin 2 years ago
Valkrin
Blakec97nickmigsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side argued the topic and instead was a contest of ad hominem. However, I feel Pro was right in his statement that people's opinions are able to be changed. But it was not on topic so it cannot be voted for. The two mainly talked about if a debate was even sensible and (as I said before) was a contest of insults. Both parties' conduct was bad, but I side with the Pro option in this, even though the Pro in this debate failed to provide a case as to why it should be allowed.