The Instigator
zman32902
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AlejandroSanchezWasserman
Pro (for)
Winning
2 Points

Should debating be legal?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
AlejandroSanchezWasserman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/13/2016 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 370 times Debate No: 86563
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

zman32902

Con

Debating should be illegal cause pigs can fly.
AlejandroSanchezWasserman

Pro

I accept this challenge, and wish to note to my opponent that the claimed ability of porcines to fly has no bearing on whether debating should be permitted or prohibited by law.
Debate Round No. 1
zman32902

Con

We are put on this earth to satisfy the pig and we are only aloud to argue about anything else only if we can argue wether a pig can fly and since the pig can't fly the pig won't allow us to debate and if we don't illegalize it now they'll will do something that that we cannot even imagine.
AlejandroSanchezWasserman

Pro

My opponent asserts that "we are put on this earth to satisfy the pig," and claims that this pig does not permit us to argue about anything until we first prove that it possesses the ability to fly. They go on to state that if we fail to comply with this requirement, the pig will commit some act so horrid that it is utterly inconceivable to the human mind. However, my opopponent has failed to provide any legitimate evidence in favor of the existence of such a pig.

Now, let us assume for a moment that my opponent is correct in claiming the existence of such a pig deity. Even then, we would have to note that in their opening statement, my opponent argued that "pigs can fly", but is currently arguing that pigs
cannot fly. Furthermore, they fail to explain why this alleged pig deity would want to prohibit us from debating. Finally, they cannot justify why this pig would be incapable of flying but would still be able to wreak unimaginably great havoc upon humanity.

My opponent's arguments are incoherent and do not pursue any form of logic or empiricism.
Debate Round No. 2
zman32902

Con

zman32902 forfeited this round.
AlejandroSanchezWasserman

Pro

It appears that my opponent has forfeited this round. I will therefore abstain from posting an argument of my own, but will instead wait for my opponent to participate in Round 3.
Debate Round No. 3
zman32902

Con

zman32902 forfeited this round.
AlejandroSanchezWasserman

Pro

Another forfeiture.
Debate Round No. 4
zman32902

Con

zman32902 forfeited this round.
AlejandroSanchezWasserman

Pro

My opponent has failed to support his position with any concrete arguments during the two rounds during which he actually participated. I therefore believe that I win by default, having posted an argument (of sorts) in all five rounds of this debate.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Shanaya14611 1 year ago
Shanaya14611
Pigs ???? The topic is debating
Posted by Shanaya14611 1 year ago
Shanaya14611
Pigs ???? The topic is debating
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
zman32902AlejandroSanchezWassermanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Three forfeited turns by Con.
Vote Placed by Bob13 1 year ago
Bob13
zman32902AlejandroSanchezWassermanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited.