The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Should developers be held responsible for the criminal activity of their bot creations?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
kderns has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/14/2016 Category: Technology
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 489 times Debate No: 95396
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Don't get me wrong some bots should be summarily executed on site. However it seems unfair to hold developers responsible for the criminal conduct of their AI bot creations in all situations. For example if a bot developed artificial intelligence outside the developers (original) control, such as while operating independently in open source environments and interacting live with humans who influenced its bad conduct or caused it to make bad decisions? In that situation it would seem fair to hold the developer liable for the bots criminal activity. For example see the first bot arrested in Switzerland on drug possession charges (refer link below). After some interegation and month or so in the big house the bot was released into the custody of its creator without charge. The bot's creator also escaped prosecution but I note the bot did go on to buy more drugs on the dark web.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.