Should gay couples be allowed to adopt children?
Debate Rounds (3)
2) There is no legal reason why gays and lesbians should be denied the right to adopt children. The law only hurts children waiting to be adopted and deprives loving parents who would care for these children.
3) There is no evidence to suggest that lesbians and gay men are unfit to be parents.
4) Good parenting is not influenced by sexual orientation. Rather, it is influenced most profoundly by a parent's ability to create a loving and nurturing home -- an ability that does not depend on whether a parent is gay or straight.
5)The children of lesbian and gay parents grow up as happy, healthy and well-adjusted as the children of heterosexual parents.
Firstly, from my  source, homosexuals are prone to having a reduced lifespan, depression, and domestic violence. Additionally, Lesbians have three times more of a chance at obtaining breast cancer versus heterosexual females. Would you not agree this causes instability and an environment that isn't safe for the adopted children? Also, the domestic violence point completely counters your statement of "stability of gay couples' relationships" as this clearly shows instability.
===ADOPTED CHILDREN WAIT===
My opponent makes it seem as if the number of same-sex couples is a significant number. For example, take the United States. In 2007 there were 777,000 same-sex couples and only 20% of them actually raised children . To go even further, from 2002 there were 7.3 million women and their partners who couldn't give birth to children due to infertility . Clearly, there are a large number of parents that can adopt with same-sex couples left out of the equation.
===GAY-COUPLES ARE UNFIT TO BE PARENTS===
As I've proved in my refutation of your first point, gay couples are prone to more problems than their heterosexual counterparts. This causes an unsafe environment for their adopted children which could have negative impacts on them. Additionally, you can read a quote from my first source stating the benefits of having a mother and a father.
My opponent goes on to say that sexual orientation does not have an impact on raising a child. However, like I've just stated, gay-couples are prone to do more negative things that could harm the development of child into becoming a mature adult.
Thanks for the interesting debate PRO and by the way, 2,000 characters is a little small.
My opponents argument ageist mine seems cruel. Why make a child suffer in an orphanage just because we do not want gays to adopt? It makes no sense to me. Gays cannot make their own children together.  Studies indicate that gays and lesbians do not abuse their children more than heterosexual parents (in fact, some studies suggest that heterosexual biological fathers and stepfathers are more likely to be abusive than gay fathers)
On to gays are unfit. Well his point is invalid because this does not make them UNFIT. This just means they have more problems then the normal family. That is no reason to not let them adopt. Plus any of these things can happen to a normal married couple!  There are 1 million lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender parents raising about 2 million children in the U.S., according to figures analyzed by UCLA's Williams Institute. Good parents are good parents, no matter their sexual orientation.
Big surprise, not every single child has a perfect life. It's certainly no-where near as bad for the child as having neither a mother or a father. In fact, there's plenty of research that shows that children of gay parents turn out just fine.
 This suggestion is often made by people who object to homosexuality in general. However, all evidence runs counter to the notion that gay and lesbian parents somehow seek to transform their children into homosexuals. Also, most gays and lesbians point out that they were born and raised by heterosexual parents.
Firstly, to begin, my opponent says how my arguments seem cruel. His reasoning behind this implies that children suffer while in an orphanage. Despite the fact that he does not back this up, I will take the liberty of providing evidence that orphanages do not make children suffer: "Contrary to conventional wisdom, the researchers found that children raised in orphanages by non family members were no worse in their health, emotional and cognitive functioning, and physical growth than those cared for in their communities by relatives. More important, the orphanage-reared children performed better than their counterparts cared for by community strangers, which is commonly the case in foster-care programs."  In my arguments, I went on to say that the pool of adopting gay-couples is so small and it would not make a difference. On the contrary, there is a much larger pool of infertile couples that can adopt.
Next, I don't recall saying anything about abuse to children, however I do remember saying things about domestic violence towards their partners, which causes instability in the household.
Additionally, my opponent admits gay-couples have more problems than heterosexuals. Even though this doesn't literally makes them "unfit" to be parents, it still provides a less suitable environment than that of heterosexuals. Next, my opponent says these things happen to normal married couples. Well, this claim is too general and unspecific, that's like me saying "gays can murder people." How many people? How many gays?
Next, how are your statistics from your second source showing that gay couples are good parents Also, I never said that gay couples seek to transform their children into homosexuals.
debatefreak22 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 5 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.