The Instigator
livyrocks10
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
Mr.Sentrybuster
Con (against)
Losing
4 Points

Should girls be able to play on boys sports teams?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
livyrocks10
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/3/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,526 times Debate No: 51536
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

livyrocks10

Pro

I think girls SHOULD be able to play on boys sports teams because it will give us more of a challenge. If you are the top of the sport with just girls then you may want a challenge with the guys. Although some girls may not want to play with the guys because of some reason but I think it should at least be an option.
Mr.Sentrybuster

Con

I don't believe that girls should be able to play on male sports teas. Simply put, there are way too many physical differences between the two genders, Pro is suggesting that girls should be able to play in sports such as Youth Football (American not international), This would be perfectly fine if they have their own individual league, but suggesting that they can play against boys (in football) who are near 2x their size. They would get injured, Especially in a league of 8-12, (Char limit)
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by DamienGoodwin11 1 year ago
DamienGoodwin11
no: this is not sexist but they should not because if girls go and play on the football team they could get plowed of remember this comment is no sexist!!!!!!
Posted by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
Sexist
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
livyrocks10Mr.SentrybusterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had superior premises
Vote Placed by MrJosh 3 years ago
MrJosh
livyrocks10Mr.SentrybusterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments because PRO is arguing for an it to be an option, while CON is arguing that in specific instances (in specific sports, when there is a large size difference) it will be dangerous.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
livyrocks10Mr.SentrybusterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: hard to decide but con has better spelling and grammar, pro fails to state why it would be a challenge--because girls are better athletes? He fails to state the reason.
Vote Placed by ESocialBookworm 3 years ago
ESocialBookworm
livyrocks10Mr.SentrybusterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Punctuation could have been better for both. Convincing arguments goes to Pro because of personal opinions.