Should girls be aloud on boys sports teams
Debate Rounds (2)
The reason why is because a boy can cause more major injuries to a girl, compared to another guy. Stated by journalist Janelle Greer, "Plain and simple, females are the weaker vessels of the two sexes. It's not degrading. It's not an insult. It's a fact of life". And my opponent even agrees with the following quote: "I know you might hurt them or touch them in the wrong place". If thats the case, why risk it?
My opponent says the following: "Still girls have rights as guys. Girls should have fun like guys". Girls can have fun similar to guys with their own all female sports team. I agree that they have rights, but that doesn't mean they should play a sport with guys; they can play a sport with other females. So technically we are not taking away their right to play sports, we are just suggesting not to let them play with guys because they can get hurt more easily.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by EverlastingMoment 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: This was a fairly straightforward decision, Con put forward the only rebuttal that girls will get hurt unnecessarily and greater than if they were separated which was also reasonably sourced which further backed up the quote by Janelle Greer. Pro never actually disputed this, and in fact accepted this rebuttal which almost led me to some confusion while reading her response. Pro herself never even put forward any arguments other than the one she adopted from the start of the debate which started to drag on during the second round. Spelling and grammar was also awarded to Con due to Pros rather obvious grammatical errors which weighed her argument down further, "Girls have rights!!!!!!" "Your going to get hurt" "If you were play wesilting then watch your hands" are some examples of this. So overall Con wins this debate hands down.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.