The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
6 Points

Should girls be aloud on boys sports teams

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/24/2015 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 757 times Debate No: 83013
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)




Yes cause girls should be treated just the same as guys.If girls really want to play then they should be able too.Girls have as many rights as guys do too. So girls should be aloud to play football,wrestling, soccer, and other guys sports. I know you might hurt them or touch them in the wrong place.Still girls should have rigths like guys. I don't care who you are or what you believe in! Girls should be aloud on guys sports teams and be treated how we want to be treated. Girls have rights!!!!!!!


The reason why is because a boy can cause more major injuries to a girl, compared to another guy. Stated by journalist Janelle Greer, "Plain and simple, females are the weaker vessels of the two sexes. It's not degrading. It's not an insult. It's a fact of life". And my opponent even agrees with the following quote: "I know you might hurt them or touch them in the wrong place". If thats the case, why risk it?


Debate Round No. 1


Still girls have rights as guys. Girls should have fun like guys. Still guys might hurt them, but if girls want to play they should get to play. Girls have rights! They are people not animals or slaves. So let girls play on sports teams if they get hurt so what. It's football or whatever sport they are playing. Your going to get hurt. You can't do nothing about it. If you were play wesilting then watch your hands and plus at my school girls play guys sports teams and they don't get hurt.........


My opponent says the following: "Still girls have rights as guys. Girls should have fun like guys". Girls can have fun similar to guys with their own all female sports team. I agree that they have rights, but that doesn't mean they should play a sport with guys; they can play a sport with other females. So technically we are not taking away their right to play sports, we are just suggesting not to let them play with guys because they can get hurt more easily.
Debate Round No. 2
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by DiamondTartarus 2 years ago
Girls should have football opportunities like boys
Posted by Zarroette 2 years ago
>Should girls be aloud on boys sports teams

You presume that girls have the capacity to speak.
Posted by whiteflame 2 years ago
>Reported vote: fire_wings// Mod action: Removed<

5 points to Pro (Arguments, Sources). Reasons for voting decision: This was a very short and easy debate to read. I will give this debate to Con for many reasons. The first reason is that he had the sources which was 1, and Pro had no sources throughout the whole debate. Secondly, Pro's argument was about girls should get the same rights as guys. Con successfully rebuts that they have girl sport teams. Easily, I give this win to Con.

[*Reason for removal*] (1) Arguments points are insufficient. The voter needs to not just analyze Pro's arguments in order to come to a decision, unless they explain how the burdens justify such an outcome. (2) Source points are insufficient. The voter needs to do more than just say that one side had sources while the other didn't. If one side was the only one that had sources, the voter merely needs to point to the importance of those sources in their arguments, but without that, the voter just seems to be voting on who had the most sources rather than any substance.
Posted by wwwwh 2 years ago
"If you were play wesilting(wrestling) then watch your hands "- if guys were forced to watch their hands when wrestling a girl, then that hesitation and fear would give the girl an unfair advantage- because in sports like that, the slightest hesitation means the difference between winning and losing...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by EverlastingMoment 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: This was a fairly straightforward decision, Con put forward the only rebuttal that girls will get hurt unnecessarily and greater than if they were separated which was also reasonably sourced which further backed up the quote by Janelle Greer. Pro never actually disputed this, and in fact accepted this rebuttal which almost led me to some confusion while reading her response. Pro herself never even put forward any arguments other than the one she adopted from the start of the debate which started to drag on during the second round. Spelling and grammar was also awarded to Con due to Pros rather obvious grammatical errors which weighed her argument down further, "Girls have rights!!!!!!" "Your going to get hurt" "If you were play wesilting then watch your hands" are some examples of this. So overall Con wins this debate hands down.