Should government ban adoption of children?
Debate Rounds (2)
When family, who doesn't have a child, may be because of health problems , can give homeless children a refuge. After sigh an agreement of adoption, parents should provide children for education, food and cholthes. In my point of view, adoption of chldren should not be banned, because is opportunity for children to survive in recent harsh conditions of life.
For Prohibiting all the humiliations and sexual abuse of children who become adopted, government should watch over child's life, contact with parents and adopted child, also they can check the conditions of family, if the child is not abroad. If there could be misanderstandings or non-compliance with rules, then government should punish that family or give an arest.
In conclusion I want to say that If you are going to adapt child,whom you really don't know, you should be ready for everything. You should not be ready by finance conditions , but by psychological problems or other way become the happiest family with your adopted child.
About cruelty to the children you started first and this is great problem. Persons who takes children from orphanages not pass at least some expertise or something like this and as result we have destroyed physically and psychologically little children. Thus, according to the expert of the Commissioner for Children's Rights in Moscow Galina Families:
"Since 1991, the total number of children adopted by foreigners, killing five children and 16 were victims of accidents," in Russia in the same period of 1220 children were killed, of whom 12 were killed by their adoptive parents."
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.