The Instigator
Chunryeong
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ishallannoyyo
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points

Should government guarantee common welfare?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ishallannoyyo
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/2/2012 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 779 times Debate No: 25413
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

Chunryeong

Con

Sure!!
Government should guarantee welfare.

But I want to ask you WHY government should guarantee welfare.

Please understand my short English...

Almost people produces goods, and makes society wealthy because they have to survive.
People gets goods through their money which they earned
People get back as they worked. hardworking people live happy life.

Common welfare deprives efforts of hardworking people.
And common welfare gives it to lazy people.

It's not fair.
ishallannoyyo

Pro

I thank my oppponent for his comments.

Because of a low character count of only 1000, I'll try to keep this at a minimum.

Common welfare deprives efforts of hardworking people and common welfare gives it to lazy people.
I invite my opponent to explain how welfare deprives the efforts of hard-working people. They work just as hard and since they are more successful, they pay more taxes. Some of these taxes then go to the less fortunate, how does it deprive hardworking people of their efforts? Will they just stop working to try and get on welfare?

My opponent's entire case is based on the fact that the people receiving welfare are lazy. This is completely incorrect. In the economic crises in 2008, everybody who was laid off no longer had jobs. Thus, they made no money. They thus needed welfare to survive. Does this make them lazy because they are victims of misfortune?

Welfare is completely fair, the rich are giving back a little to the poor.

Welfare is completely fair, VOTE PRO.
Debate Round No. 1
Chunryeong

Con

Chunryeong forfeited this round.
ishallannoyyo

Pro

Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
Chunryeong

Con

Chunryeong forfeited this round.
ishallannoyyo

Pro

Extend all arguments. VOTE CON.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Yep 5 years ago
Yep
ChunryeongishallannoyyoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 5 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
ChunryeongishallannoyyoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Quick and easy
Vote Placed by Clash 5 years ago
Clash
ChunryeongishallannoyyoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited two times. Pro successfully refuted Con's argument and also successfully showed that the government should guarantee common welfare. Welfare is good but should have some limitations on it.
Vote Placed by KuriouserNKuriouser 5 years ago
KuriouserNKuriouser
ChunryeongishallannoyyoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff