The Instigator
johndaviddeoliveira
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TorqueDork
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Should interstates NOT EXIST?????

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TorqueDork
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/18/2013 Category: Economics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 434 times Debate No: 42602
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

johndaviddeoliveira

Pro

The interstates should be torn down to shreds because it was one of the DUMBEST IDEAS of the 1950s!!!!!!
TorqueDork

Con

I accept your debate! Thanks for starting it! Also, I've had way too many forfeits latley! don't join their ranks.

The interstates should be torn down to shreds because it was one of the DUMBEST IDEAS of the 1950s!!!!!!
For starters- tearing down the interstates would be irrationally expensive and secondly you never say why it was such a dumb idea. I will provide definitions below.
noun: interstate highway
  1. 1.
    one of a system of expressways covering the 48 contiguous states.
Debate Round No. 1
johndaviddeoliveira

Pro

johndaviddeoliveira forfeited this round.
TorqueDork

Con


Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
johndaviddeoliveira

Pro

johndaviddeoliveira forfeited this round.
TorqueDork

Con

Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 2 years ago
KingDebater
johndaviddeoliveiraTorqueDorkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had unnecessary punctuation, unnecessary capitalization of whole words and most importantly, no arguments.
Vote Placed by STALIN 2 years ago
STALIN
johndaviddeoliveiraTorqueDorkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't really present any arguments. Pro also ff. Points go to Con.