The Instigator
Dude101
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheCommonMan
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Should it be illegal for pro athletes (hockey players, wrestlers etc.) to eat Mcdonald's?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
TheCommonMan
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/29/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 609 times Debate No: 53627
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Dude101

Pro

No they shouldn't because it makes them fat and therefore they perform crappy and it genetically messes them up!
TheCommonMan

Con

I accept and I await my opponent's argument.
Debate Round No. 1
Dude101

Pro

Dude101 forfeited this round.
TheCommonMan

Con

My opponent has closed his account, so I will just provide a very brief argument to defend my position.

Resolution: Should it be illegal for pro athletes (hockey players, wrestlers etc.) to eat Mcdonald's?

I am con. Therefore, I must provide reasons as to why it should not be illegal for pro athletes to eat McDonald's.

1. McDonald's does have food which would help an athlete out. For example, McDonald's burgers do have alot of protein in them. Therefore, it might help out athletes looking to buid their frame. This is just one example. However, in the link below, you can view the different nutrients that can come from McDonald's food.

http://nutrition.mcdonalds.com...

2. Banning athletes from McDonald's is a violation of the three unalienable rights. In addition, it's discrimination against athletes. Therefore, it wouldn't be okay to ban athletes from eating McDonald's.


Once again, I know this is short, but my opponent closed his account, so I don't need to put up an extensive argument. Let's take a look at this. I provided an argument, my opponent didn't. I used sources, my opponent didn't. Spelling and conduct are up in the air at this point. Even though my argument isn't very good, it is AN ARGUMENT. Therefore, it's easy to see how I should easily win this debate. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 2
Dude101

Pro

Dude101 forfeited this round.
TheCommonMan

Con

Extend all arguments.
Debate Round No. 3
Dude101

Pro

Dude101 forfeited this round.
TheCommonMan

Con

Extend all arguments.
Debate Round No. 4
Dude101

Pro

Dude101 forfeited this round.
TheCommonMan

Con

Extend all arguments.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Jevinigh 3 years ago
Jevinigh
Some crazy topics lately :p
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Swagmasterpoopoo 3 years ago
Swagmasterpoopoo
Dude101TheCommonManTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF