The Instigator
I_am_the_DebateKing
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

Should it be illegal to look at people while eating a banna?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+5
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/7/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,486 times Debate No: 48535
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

I_am_the_DebateKing

Pro

Think about it people.... it disgusting
STALIN

Con

Why should it be illegal though?
Debate Round No. 1
I_am_the_DebateKing

Pro

Okay, here is an example, if you are in the park, doo doo do... minding your own business, and you see a person, eating a banana, and staring at you. This can invade personal privacy, and could be scary to some people.
STALIN

Con

Eating a banana and looking at another person will not scare him/her. My opponent will need to prove that it would. And how would this invade personal privacy and scare a person?
Debate Round No. 2
I_am_the_DebateKing

Pro

Okay Hitler i surrender, you can eat as many nasty bananas as you want. I'm sorry i ever doubted your authority... the world is yours to rule.
STALIN

Con

Since its nasty to eat banana's while looking at other people, is it nasty to eat grapes and pickles while looking at people? Anyway, my opponent "surrendered."
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by STALIN 2 years ago
STALIN
lol its fine.
Posted by I_am_the_DebateKing 2 years ago
I_am_the_DebateKing
sorry guys, this was just a troll... my peers wanted me to post this one...

Sorry
Posted by ESocialBookworm 2 years ago
ESocialBookworm
DESPICABLE me!
Posted by Trk1 2 years ago
Trk1
I iz confused, but this is true
Posted by ZACHATTACK782 2 years ago
ZACHATTACK782
tis very very true
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by TheAntidoter 2 years ago
TheAntidoter
I_am_the_DebateKingSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con did not answer privacy invasion, which is a legitimate concern. In addition, pro's last round is not a guaranteed concession due to godwin's law. Therefore, Pro wins.
Vote Placed by Skrone 2 years ago
Skrone
I_am_the_DebateKingSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I thought it was hilarious that he called the guy with the username Stalin 'hitler'
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
I_am_the_DebateKingSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I take it that a 'surrender' means a concession.