Should it be legal to have an abortion?
Debate Rounds (5)
Reasons: If abortion was legal; murder should be legal.
Abortion is murder. It is killing a child. A killer / A murderer. Killing = Murder.
If then abortion was fine then Oscar Pistorius would be innocent. Even if he killed Reeva purposefully.
He killed her because he didn't want her. It would make his life easier. So basically he "aborted" her when she was much older.
Please take on this debate. I wish to speak more.
Babies in the womb can feel pain. They develop their full nerve system by the time they are between 8 and 16 weeks old.
At 8 weeks old, the baby is FULLY developed.
About the animals:
Not going to reply to that.
Who says that the world will "overflow?" There are millions of people dying all the time.
Also, you never refuted the fact that you are taking a right away from people, a freedom which is what America was founded to be. If you want to get rid of a baby for its own good, how is it bad?
Overpopulation rebuttal: Yes, people are dying every day, but more people are being brought in by a substantial amount. Otherwise, the population would stay the same instead of increasing. That argument is fully invalid and you know you were just taking a shot in the dark. Plus, if you add the abortions into the amount being born over the thousands of years people have been getting rid of babies they do not desire, just think of how many people would flood this world.
Now. Evolution is racism. Charles Darwin says that Negroes/Black Africans etc. are UNDEVELOPED = Hitler. He tried to rid the world of the "undeveloped". So if you go with evolution, you are a NAZI supporter.
If you believe in God, then you are disobeying His law. He says "Do not murder". By the way: You didn't reply to the fact that the babies are fully developed.
This is getting very interesting. Thanks for joining the debate.
Evolution is not racism. This is not a debate of evolution, but if you must, then my argument is that 13 year-olds used to look really young and now you can't even tell the difference between a 13 year old and a 21 year-old. Because of CHANGE over TIME(evolution) that made people develop more quickly to reproduce at younger ages. They start going through puberty at about 9 now and that is a fact, look it up. It is very grotesque and weird in my opinion, but fact nonetheless.
And no, I'm not a Nazi supporter, but fact is fact. You are reading too much into it like English teachers are like "the tree is red in the painting to symbolize the anger of the artist." Maybe the artist just wanted the dang trees to be red. Hitler and Nazis have nothing to do with evolution besides being supporters of it and condoning evolution and Nazis are two different things.
My argument for the God thing, Really? If you need to realize that you are disobeying "God's Law" to not murder someone or need to read a book of a thousand metaphors to realize you shouldn't be a dick, then you have no reason, logic, empathy, or sympathy and you belong in an insane asylum.
Babies are fully developed? no, otherwise, they would just pop out of the womb after the trimester that abortion is legal. They would not survive if not for being in the womb at that time. They have to grow and develop more to survive.
Okay okay okay WAIT! Firstly we need to get rid of this Evolution! How did the world start?
It could not have started in a warm pool = The moon is getting further and further every year. If this earth was so old, the moon would have been right here and the tides would have been ballistic.
Big Bang = Utterly insane. Ever heard of an explosion and out popped something perfect? Its like breaking a glass and it becomes a fancy doorbell! FOR GOODNESS SAKE.
Now, I have one more thing to say about evolution. Clown Fish. how do they work? They are not allergic to sea anemones? It couldn't have gradually have passed on! As the first ones would have gone extinct.
I guess we have to spell it out. This world was made by a wonderful, majestic CREATOR.
tyrob99 forfeited this round.
TalkForLife forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Aircraftfreak1 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: I enjoyed reading both, But Con had better arguments
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.