The Instigator
JOHNMCDONALD
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Niwsa
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

Should jacking off be legal in public parks?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Niwsa
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/17/2012 Category: Economics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,975 times Debate No: 28324
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)

 

JOHNMCDONALD

Pro

This will make America a better place!!
Niwsa

Con

I accept my opponent's challenge and contend that jacking off should not be legal in public parks.

I assume that by jacking off my opponent refers to masturbation.

And that public parks refers to public parks in the United States.

I'll let my opponent post his arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
JOHNMCDONALD

Pro

How could this not be a good idea? I have been studying this topic for the past 15 years and in my line of work I have come to find that masturbation in the public is the only masturbation suitable for most people. This is much better than masturbaiting in private. I am sure you know that the best masturbation is in largely crowded parks. I know you do it at least 3 times a week. I'm sure you understand. That is why you are pro/for this argument right?
Niwsa

Con

Pro simply doesn't back up his assertions that
"masturbation in the public is the only masturbation suitable for most people." and that

"this is much better than masturbaiting in private."

If masturbation is legal in public parks it would violate indecency laws currently on the books for numerous reasons.

One of these reason is to ensure that children are not exposed to sexuality inadvertently without the will of their parents.

Jacking off should not be legal in public parks.

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 2
JOHNMCDONALD

Pro

Jacking off is the foundation of American people. Doing it in public justifies the United States of America.
Niwsa

Con

Unwarranted argument, extend my arguments.

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by DrHaz3 4 years ago
DrHaz3
Damn, i was really hoping you would take this debate more seriously Pro and build some sources and a rock hard case. Perhaps Raising a few points about the physical relaxation and stress relief when the muscles contract and release with which you can erect your platform about health and excercise while possibly mentioning the chubby epidimic sweeping the nation. Maybe a few solid links to cite current case studies of public masterbation via webcam. Perhaps even how it is beneficial to the childeren as an educational instrument. you know something simple along these lines or something...
Posted by The_Master_Riddler 4 years ago
The_Master_Riddler
What the h@ll was this debate about? That's just nasty doing that in public.
Posted by JOHNMCDONALD 4 years ago
JOHNMCDONALD
You all know I am right. You know this is an idea we all want. Just admit it and switch your side to pro so you can stop being in denial.
Posted by ockcatdaddy 4 years ago
ockcatdaddy
this shouldn't even be a debate...like really now if i'm castrated nthing wil come out when i ejaculate you debates conflict and are you sure you are a male and not just a female with an account registered as a male??
Posted by phantom 4 years ago
phantom
How can we jack off when our penises have been castrated?
Posted by brian_eggleston 4 years ago
brian_eggleston
Only if it was legal for ladies, gentlemen should certainly refrain from knocking one off the wrist in public.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by The_Master_Riddler 4 years ago
The_Master_Riddler
JOHNMCDONALDNiwsaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Simply nasty topic(conduct) says that con is pro(grammar) bad arguments on pro's side (convincing arg.)
Vote Placed by utahjoker 4 years ago
utahjoker
JOHNMCDONALDNiwsaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't think that jacking off is in the Constitution
Vote Placed by frozen_eclipse 4 years ago
frozen_eclipse
JOHNMCDONALDNiwsaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious decision
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
JOHNMCDONALDNiwsaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: No serious arguments from the pro and cons arguments went largely unrefuted. Conduct to the con to though because it seems that pro didnt even take this debate seriously