The Instigator
Pro (for)
4 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Should juvinilles be punished as adults in the court of law?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/21/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 737 times Debate No: 34008
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)




Yes. They should. I believe this because the crime they commit is what should be taken accordingly. If a juvenile is charged and found guilty for murder, they should receive the same punishment as anybody who committed the same crime.
Debate Round No. 1


Hmmmm.. no.
Debate Round No. 2


Well, since your whole argument is "no," then I intend to prove my point by continuing the fact that equality in the courtroom needs to be amended.


well maybe.. ahh nevermind. no.
Debate Round No. 3


Statistics from the government show that 55% of murders, 60% of batteries, 57% of assaults, and 42% of robberies have all been committed by minors under the age of 18, still considered legally as a child. More than 80% of these crimes have gone with little to no punishment. Therefore, 65% of the criminals committed the same crime more than once again.


that_dude_gb forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Kumquatodor 3 years ago
Pro's argument (or lack thereof):

55% of murders are from teens without punishment. They sometimes do it twice. Crimes should be taken accordingly because I say so. Therefore, they should be punished as adults.

This is a leap in logic. Con had no Burden of Proof, so he won.

I can't vote because I have no phone. If I could, I would vote like this.

Who did I agree with before: Con (0 points)
Who did I agree with after: Con (0 points)
Conduct: Pro because Con forfeited. (1 point)
S/G: Pro because Con didn't have grammar (1 point)
Arguments: Con because, as explained above, Pro had no logical argument (3 points)
Sources: Tied. Pro almost got this because he had (dramatic voice) "Statistics from the government". If he had said which exact sources, he would have won. However, he did not.

Final tally:

Pro: 2 points
Con: 3 points.
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Con's account has been deactivated, thus he will probably forfeit.
Posted by niltiac 3 years ago
At this point, so is he. He has no evidence or proof. All he has is "No." And, yes, I do have evidence. Maybe you should check the debate..
Posted by serp888 3 years ago
All he has to do is say no until you give any reason. At this point all you're giving is an opinion.
Posted by niltiac 3 years ago
Con is winning..? All they've said is "no."
Posted by serp888 3 years ago
Con is winning so far! Pro hasn't provided any reasons, or evidence for anything yet.
Posted by iDontGivaFucc 3 years ago
No. They are minors for a reason. Funny thing about this country is, when that same child has sex with an older adult suddenly they're young, innocent, and aren't mature enough etc.. But the minute they commit a crime now its they should be tried as an adult. SMH. At least have some consistency. I mean if they are going to be charged as adults, then why can't they drink,go to war,drive,sex with adults.... etc..
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made a case, a weak one, but still a case. Additionally con forfeited.