The Instigator
22keckhaylee
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
democratic_avenger007.5
Con (against)
Losing
2 Points

Should kids be able to drive under the age of 18

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
22keckhaylee
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/28/2016 Category: Cars
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 600 times Debate No: 85700
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

22keckhaylee

Pro

Kids under the age of 18 should not be able to drive. They cause a lot of deaths for them selves and their friends. They often text and drive. They drink and drive. They go out and party then drive home and crash into a telephone pole. These kids are either seriously hert and killed. The kids these days all they want to do is be on their phones and be able to talk to their friends. Yeah i get that they can have fun and go to the grocery store but they don't always go where they say their going. They could go to their friends house then go to the grocery store. In that length of time they could have gotten in a wreck and you wouldn't even have know in.
democratic_avenger007.5

Con

This is topic is mostly one sided towards the pro . Anyways i shall fight and win this debate hopefully. Now listen i think that children may be allowed to drive under the age of 18 . don't take this statement in the wrong way, I'm not talking about 12 year old taking their dads bmw around town with friends, I'm talking about slightly older people. I feel children under the age of 16 children shouldn't drive.
Debate Round No. 1
22keckhaylee

Pro

22keckhaylee forfeited this round.
democratic_avenger007.5

Con

The topic is should kids be able to drive under the age and you are the instigator . which means u think yes. You just gave a whole list of reason which are saying no children should not drive under the age of 18. I don't understand this debate
Debate Round No. 2
22keckhaylee

Pro

22keckhaylee forfeited this round.
democratic_avenger007.5

Con

2 rounds forfeited. i should win
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Calbert 1 year ago
Calbert
If you are the pro, you are FOR the statement. Oh my god xDD
Posted by democratic_avenger007.5 1 year ago
democratic_avenger007.5
ihateeveryone on this website u made my point for me. u r pro i am con
Posted by ihateveryoneonthiswebsite 1 year ago
ihateveryoneonthiswebsite
yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by WhineyMagiciann5 1 year ago
WhineyMagiciann5
I just want to point out that you took the side of pro when you are actually con.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Hayd 1 year ago
Hayd
22keckhayleedemocratic_avenger007.5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argues that teenagers text and drive and drink and drive which causes danger to themselves and others. This is dropped by Con, and Con presents no arguments of his own, thus Pro wins arguments. Pro forfeited lots of rounds, so conduct to con.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
22keckhayleedemocratic_avenger007.5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture