The Instigator
BOB555111
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
sboss18
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Should kids play more than 3 hours of video games a day

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
sboss18
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/15/2016 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 304 times Debate No: 98074
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

BOB555111

Pro

People play video games more than three hours a day. Some experts state that it rots your brain.
sboss18

Con

Should (Ought to): used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions.

The assertion that all children have an obligation or duty to play video games for more than three hours a day is ludicrious. What is the purpose? My opponent even states "Some experts state that it rots your brain," making his claim worse. The resolution is absurd, vote Con.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Agonist 1 year ago
Agonist
BOB555111sboss18Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I agreed wholeheartedly with the Contender.
Vote Placed by Hylian_3000 1 year ago
Hylian_3000
BOB555111sboss18Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro kinda conceded in round 1. Additionally, since he didn't give a definition, I have to vote on Con's definition. Using this definition, Con's argument makes logical sense and Pro has nothing against it.