The Instigator
Tigress_159
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
zmikecuber
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points

Should kids under 14 play full contact football

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
zmikecuber
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/20/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 966 times Debate No: 46357
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Tigress_159

Con

It is non beneficial for kids to be playing Full contact football. a young man was just killed playing that.
zmikecuber

Pro

My opponent makes a bare assertion logical fallacy. (1) Then he goes on to claim that a child died playing football. This is unsourced, and is anecdotal evidence. (2)

Playing football has many positive effects. It provides young boys and girls a chance to get exercise, compete against one another, and to have fun.

(1) http://simple.wikipedia.org...
(2) https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Tigress_159

Con

Tigress_159 forfeited this round.
zmikecuber

Pro

FF. Extend all arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
Tigress_159

Con

Tigress_159 forfeited this round.
zmikecuber

Pro

Ah, well. Looks like this will end in a forfeit. Here's some Jason Aldean.
Debate Round No. 3
Tigress_159

Con

Tigress_159 forfeited this round.
zmikecuber

Pro

Please vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by MysticEgg 2 years ago
MysticEgg
Tigress_159zmikecuberTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for forfeit. Pro made better arguments (because he was the only one) and he was also the only one to use sources. Sources to Pro, too.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
Krazzy_Player
Tigress_159zmikecuberTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF