The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
4 Points

Should limitations based on age be placed on child-friendly websites?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/28/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 760 times Debate No: 31770
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




For an example I will use Neopets:

1. The under 13 years of age, is unable to send NeoFriend requests, messages and access to the forums unless a complicated parent-signed waiver is physically sent to Neopets. I see a couple things wrong with this, as many children play Neopets to play games with their friends, and for many- sending a piece of mail a week away is nearly not an option- I know my mum didn't want her signature floating around internationally.

The forums are so heavily monitored that inappropriate language cannot be achieved- or noticed unless you know the replacement words. The forums would be a great way for a kid to get help passing a certain level on their favorite game or getting tips on what food to buy their pets.

In general:
I understand the safety aspect of it all, but if the forums are being monitored closely enough for it to be put on a children's website, then there should not be a problem.


I accept this debate.

I agree Neopets is excessive, but it is more the exception than the rule. Most websites with age limitations like that only require a parent's email address. This shouldn't really be too much to ask.

Really the only benefit to removing the age limit would be a little more fun. All the benefits of help or tips on the game that the Con brought up could be found other places online without age limits.

It is better to be safe than sorry when safety comes so easily.
Debate Round No. 1


MissUndomiel forfeited this round.


Well, I'm pretty sure that my opponent forfeiting means I win, so vote for me.
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by MissUndomiel 3 years ago
Fixed. :)
Posted by Gondun 3 years ago
What is the age and rank criteria for this debate? It says I don't meet them.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Magic8000 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF