Should man be allowed to make love to a machine?
Debate Rounds (3)
Only downside is, as with any machine, it will be coming with a cost. And if the price tag is heftier than paying for dates or hiring a professional then chances are, you also won't make love to a machine given that circumstance.
But your question is not about whether one will or will not be able to make love with a machine which makes it a legal case. Will it be illegal?
I don't want to go thru morality dilemmas. Only way it will be illegal is if it will affect national interest.
Following my premises, since a machine is efficient and reliable, it will be better than humans in giving fun.
Sooner or later, mankind will prefer the machine over each other, and this could be bad for the population which will prompt the government to disallow it at the onset.
Only women should be allowed to continue having sex with machines.
I support affirmative action for women having sex with machines; because, before women had their personal sex machines, they would go to doctors for orgasms, as a way to deal with hysteria.
Hysteria is a word that is related to hysterectomy.
Women should be allowed to deal with their hysteria, without going to a doctor; because the gene pool could become inbred, from doctors fathering so many children in their neighborhoods.
Women need special rights, to keep them from becoming hysterical; that's why even though the average man makes more money, the average woman makes 80% of purchasing decisions.
That's why even though a woman can't get pregnant without a man's help, they feel the need to have the power to kill their babies.
That's why, even though all men will get prostate cancer if they live long enough... so much money and energy goes to breast cancer awareness. Angelina Jolie only had a 50% chance of getting breast cancer.
Women need to continue having sex with machines, men don't.
Oh, the PC way to talk about a woman having sex with machines, is to say, the woman is "making love" to the machine.
You're already giving half of humanity the right to make love to machines on the shaky grounds of preventing or curing hysteria. Again, shaky grounds but should we follow it, don't men experience hysteria too? That said the male population should also be allowed to have sex with machines because they have sexual needs too. If you prick men, do they not bleed?
Equal rights for all!!! Don't discriminate the men! They need robots too!!!
On second thought, there are other more less controversial ways of preventing preventing or curing hysteria. Such as medication and a programed diet.
Calm down lady.
No need to get hysterical. ;)
Out of the things I mentioned... women making less money than men, but still making 80% of the buying decisions, hysterical women who expect men to be more concerned about women having a 50% change of getting breast cancer than men having a 100% chance of getting prostate cancer if they live long enough, and women demanding the right to kill men's children (or demanding men support children who they never get to see)... Don't you think men should be abstinent until they get equal rights in more important things than having sex with machines?
Here's a couple links to the word, "hysteria."
hysterical (adj.) Look up hysterical at Dictionary.com1610s, from Latin hystericus "of the womb," from Greek hysterikos "of the womb, suffering in the womb," from hystera "womb" (see uterus). Originally defined as a neurotic condition peculiar to women and thought to be caused by a dysfunction of the uterus. Meaning "very funny" (by 1939) is from the notion of uncontrollable fits of laughter. Related: Hysterically.
Hysteria, in its colloquial use, describes unmanageable emotional excesses. The fear can be centered on a body part, or most commonly, on an imagined problem with that body part
By the mid to late 19th century, hysteria (or sometimes female hysteria) came to refer to what is today generally considered to be sexual dysfunction. Typical treatment was massage of the patient's genitalia by the physician and, later, by vibrators or water sprays to cause orgasm.
It looks like hysteria is a womb thing to me.
However you also asserted that a portion of men, namely the male population are 100% susceptible to prostate cancer. A cancer often caused by by lack of sexual activity. All the more then, they we should allow both sexes of mankind to have sex with robots.
The pro really changed my mind.
I have decided she was right.
Women shouldn't be allowed to have sex with machines either; because they should be on drugs, like she said in the last round...
"On second thought, there are other more less controversial ways of preventing preventing or curing hysteria. Such as medication and a programed diet."
Medications should work on men who think they can "make love* to machines too.
Nobody should be allowed to have sex with machines.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.