Should monkeys be considered persons
Debate Rounds (4)
2. A human being is a man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other animals by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance.
3. A monkey is a small to medium-sized primate that typically has a long tail, most kinds of which live in trees in tropical countries.
4. With the exception of humans, which inhabit every continent, most primates live in tropical or subtropical regions of the Americas.
5. Humans and mammals are both in the category of primates.
6. Both humans and chimpanzees are able to walk bipedally.
7. An inherent value is having value as an individual, something that is inseparable from you, and equal between all.
8. All those who have inherent value have it equally, whether they are human or animals.
9. Monkeys, as well as all animals, should be regarded as children and therefore be protected since they cannot protect themselves.
10. Justice for monkeys should not be judged based on how many people get upset by the horrible acts against monkeys.
11. The monkey, so close to the species of human, is put through pain, suffering and surgical manipulation for money and individual profit.
12. If all, both humans and nonhumans, have inherent value then for the most part we are all one in the same.
13. The pain of an animal is morally relevant.
14. We cannot justify killing a human being for experimentation so therefore we should not be able to justify killing a monkey for experimentation either.
15. Humans have an obligation to protect and not harm nonhuman animals.
16. Animals are said not to have rights because they are not capable of responding to claims of morality, this should mean that it is then humans responsibility to exercise their rights for them in their best interests.
17. An ancestor is an earlier type of animal from which others have evolved.
18. Humans, apes, and other hominoids (gorillas, chimpanzees, and so on) all evolved from a common ancestor.
Therefore, Monkeys should be considered as persons.
2.Only human pain can be morally relevant.
3.Although the pain animals suffer is real, it is not wrong if no one cares about them.
4.The pain animals suffer is not the fundamental wrong.
5.The fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources and that they are only here for us.
6.Most people are not knowledgeable in that a toxicity test for cosmetics on animals is the same as using them for medical research, such as cancer.
7.Kindness is defined as acting from a certain motive, such as concern and is thought to be an act that is right.
8.Cruelty is defined as causing pain or suffering and is considered to be an act that is wrong.
9.Just as an act of kindness is not a morally right act, and act of cruelty is not a morally wrong act.
10.Humans are just as cruel to other humans as they are to animals.
11.Monkeys are not humans, they are primates and because of this they should be treated like animals, not humans.
12.Utilitarianism is a principle that states we can justify good results with evil means.
13.Although this applies to and protects humans, it applies only to them and not animals, so animals cannot be protect by this principle.
14.It is not the responsibility of humans to protect animals.
15.Inherent value is defined as existing as a permanent quality or attribute.
16.Animals, such as monkeys are not literate, and do not have the abilities or intelligence humans do, therefore they have less inherent value.
17.Only humans belong to the species group, Homo Sapiens.
Therefore, monkeys should not be considered persons.
Human pain is not the only pain that is morally relevant. Monkeys have logic and the ability to reason, so they know when they are being hurt and are in pain. The pain an animal feels is fundamentally wrong, it is being forced onto them by humans for no reason. I mean there would not be a good reason to ignore a human"s pain and there is no justifiable reason to ignore the pain of a monkey.
The system that allows humans to view animals as our resources and here for the sole benefit is wrong. The only way to change the system is to change the people who make it. Cosmetology testing on animals is the same as medical research on animals, both are harmful and unfair. Who is to say that their life should be used for experimentation? A human life has the same inherent value as a monkeys life does.
Cruelty is defined as causing pain or suffering and is considered to be an act that is wrong. Monkeys have qualities that allow them to have the very basic legal right not to be imprisoned. Humans are in essence enslaving their own race because we humans have originated from the same place as monkeys have. No one, human or nonhuman deserves to be, imprisoned.
If our lives are valued the same as a monkey"s life then that means both should be protected under the law. We are destroying ourselves in destroying the lives of these non-human animals. These monkeys cannot relay completely how they feel to us but it is relatively clear. When in pain they cry out for help, they have reason to try to escape; they are the closest in relation to humans so they need to be treated as such.
Therefore, monkeys should be considered as persons.
Human pain is the only morally relevant pain. The same way a human causes pain to an animal, and animal can cause pain to humans. If you go into an animal"s environment, they will kill you without regard to your feelings. The only differences are that we have rights and they do not, and we do not kill them for no reason. Animals are used for many necessity reasoning such as for food, clothes, or testing products. Some may believe we use animals for only cosmetic testing, however, someone who is knowledgeable in this area knows it is for more than just that. Animals are used for toxicity test for many medical purposes to save the lives of humans. Humans are also used for testing products, the only difference is the outcome it causes on the human verse the animal.
Humans and animals have different inherent values. Most monkeys do not have logic and reasoning, or else they would be able to function like humans. Yes they may be somewhat similar, but not nearly similar enough to be considered humans. Just like animals are used for medical research and testing, humans are too. The circumstances may be different between the two, however, this is because humans have rights and animals don"t. If we do not test on animals, how else do you expect to get the results to make sure it is safe to use on humans? In testing on animals, many human lives can be saved.
Monkeys do not have any rights. It is only said that they cannot be put in danger. Just because some are in captive, does not necessarily put them in danger. People are imprisoned as well, and they are safe too. Humans deserve to be imprisoned when they do something morally or legally wrong. Similarly, exotic animals that are putting humans in danger should be held captive.
Our lives are not valued the same as animals" lives, such as monkeys, because we are humans and they are not. We have rights and deserve to be treated as the humans we are. Monkeys are not humans they are primates. What makes anyone think we should treat monkeys as if they are something they are not? Should we treat an ant on the ground like a human? That doesn"t sound realistic, and neither does treating an animal as if it were a person. Monkeys and all animals should not be protected by anything besides themselves and their own kind. They definitely should not be protected by the law, because legally, it is stated that a person is any being whom the law regards as capable of rights and duties. Animals, and more importantly, monkeys do not have either and therefore should not and will not be protected.
Therefore, monkeys should not be considered persons.
A total of 20,000 monkeys die every year from research experiments out of approximately 40,000. Humans do not want to have monkeys considered as persons because it will not benefit them any longer. When you isolate a wild animal it becomes a distortion of what it once was. Monkeys are NOT dangerous animals and are able to reason and coexist peacefully with humans.
When I accidentally step on my cat or dogs tail they yelp and limp away in pain, why is that? They fail that they are in pain and they are smart enough to realize they need to move away from what is hurting them. If we know they can feel pain and react to it there pain is morally relevant. Being morally relevant is being concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character and closely connected or appropriate to the matter at hand. Humans DO KILL ANIMALS especially monkeys NEEDLESSLY so you are wrong about that. Humans have rights that"s why their lives are protected in some ways, so the reason some people do not want to allow monkeys to have the same considerations as person"s so that they may continue on violation these non-human animals without consequence. How immoral you have to defend such individuals.
Monkeys are not used for food or clothes for humans just as guinea pigs. So in what world is it morally right to harm or endanger a being for the sole benefit of one"s makeup looking smoother or more defined someone who is knowledgeable in this area knows how harmful this could possibly be but disregards that. Animals are used for toxicity test for many medical purposes to save the lives of humans. "Humans are also used for testing products, the only difference is the outcome it causes on the human verse the animal", if this is true why do monkeys die and not humans? If this is true why not continue solely testing on humans?
Humans and animals do not have different inherent values, we read the same reading and it says all being with inherent values hold the same ones. Most monkeys DO have logic and reasoning and that is proven, that is why they are such a hot commodity to be experimented on. So what you are saying is that monkeys and humans are both used for medical research and the monkey dies but not the human because they do not have rights. That is utterly ridiculous why kill monkeys pointlessly if you can save them? Human lives are not the only important lives on this planet.
If it says they cannot be put in danger then that is not being enforced anywhere. Simply taking an animal out of the wild and its natural habitat decreases their chances of survival. Injecting them with some concoction a scientist wants to test endangers the animal. You are right people are imprisoned for harming another individual or violating laws and endangering the welfare of others. A monkey is imprisoned and abused against his/her will for simply being close to Homo sapiens in DNA. We are not talking about exotic animals we are talking about monkeys and the like. Does anyone think that their child should be experimented on for the benefit of others?
Therefore, monkeys should be considered persons.
Even though a select few monkeys have been able to coexist well with humans, does not necessarily mean that ALL monkeys will. Monkeys are wild animals and deserve to be treated so. Bringing a wild animal into human societies will drive the monkey insane. It will not know how to live in that type of environment and will probably end up dying. Bringing monkeys into human life and considering them to be persons will in the end hurt them because they are not capable of responsibilities and therefore, will not survive in human society. Yes, there are a ton of monkeys that die from testing, however you never hear about the amounts that die from disease, or being eating by other animals. They live in the wild and by bringing them into human society will cause a spread of diseases to us. In trying to save the monkeys, you will actually not only hurt them, but hurt the human society as well.
Just because we know they can feel pain does not necessarily make their pain morally relevant. The same way humans kill animals; other animals kill their own species. Similarly, they do not think that animal"s feelings are morally relevant. Humans do not needlessly kill animals. They kill animals for food, clothing, or testing, in which they need to survive and find cures to illnesses. What one does to an animal is not in violation because animals do not have rights. There is nothing to violate if there is not law protecting them. Just because I defend these humans does not necessarily make it immoral.
Humans test make up and cosmetics the same way animals do. Mainly, animals die from testing of medical research, not cosmetics. Cosmetic testing is becoming more and more popular on humans, rather than animals. Monkeys are used for medical testing rather than humans, because why kill something that has rights over something that does not. There is nothing that protects animals, therefore monkeys are used to be tested on to save human lives.
If taking a monkey out of its natural habitat decreases its chance of survival, why would you want to do that? In order to consider a monkey to be a person, they must live a lifestyle as a person, which they cannot. A child is not experimented on because a child has human rights; monkey is not a human. Legally, it is stated that a person is any being whom the law regards as capable of rights and duties. Animals, and more importantly, monkeys do not have either and therefore should not and will not be protected.
Therefore, monkeys should not be considered persons.
No where in the world is it legal to kill another human being.
Monkeys and humans are similar in DNA by 98%, if that does not prove my case I do not know what will.
Blacks and white people are both humans with the same DNA makeup and at a time blacks were considered inferior and not given rights but we know today that was wrong.
Monkeys and children are similar.
Monkeys are capable of reason and understanding.
By using some monkeys in painful experiments, and selling others to universities, federal facilities, and private laboratories, where they are imprisoned in tiny cages, cut up, poisoned, crippled, addicted to drugs, shocked, and killed we are harming ourselves. Humans are selfish animals that do not think about the future and believe if someone or something does not have the means to defend themselves they can be taken advantage of.
Monkeys have been able to coexist with humans on numerous occasions.
Taking animals out of their natural habitat endangers them and makes them less likely to be able to survive with their own kind.
Humans know that animals feel pain so and they ignore their pain.
An animals pain is morally relevant.
If humans and animals are treated equally in relation to experimentation then both groups should leave alive, but that does not seem to be the case.
Through monkeys humans have found out about themselves would mean that we are so alike I can better my life through the use of yours.
If monkeys benefit humans so much they should be treated with respect and afforded the same rights, freedom and opportunity as humans.
Therefore monkeys should be considered persons.
2.Only human pain is morally relevant.
3.The pain of a monkey is irrelevant because no one cares about them.
4.An act of kindness is not morally right and similarly, cruelty is not morally wrong.
5.Just because monkeys are similar to humans does not necessarily mean they are the same.
6.Monkeys and animals cannot hold responsibilities and duties that humans can.
7.Animals, such as monkeys are not literate, and do not have the abilities or intelligence humans do, therefore they have less inherent value
8.Because monkeys are not literate, they cannot survive like humans.
9.Monkeys are similar to children, but the difference is, children have human rights and monkeys do not have any rights.
10.A child cannot legally be punished for his or her actions, similar to the way a monkey cannot.
11.Just because a select few monkeys were capable of getting along with humans, does not necessarily mean all of them will.
12.If taking monkeys out of their habitat will reduce their chance of survival, why would one want to put them in a human society will they will not be able to survive?
13.Just because humans know animals feel pain, does not necessarily make that pain morally wrong.
14.Monkeys do not have rights and therefore are not protected by anyone except their own kind.
15.Monkeys are primates, not humans.
16.Monkeys are wild animals and should be treated as such.
Therefore, monkeys should not be considered persons.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by hayhen13 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: "The pain of a monkey is irrelevant because no one cares about them." Most of Con's arguments were based off opinion and Pro's arguments had evidence. Also most of them sounded very evil and scary. I care about a living thing being in pain, your argument is therefore false.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.