The Instigator
kshitijjoshi.142
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
TheAwesomeRuler
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Should nuclear wepons be banned or no???

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/4/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 934 times Debate No: 32081
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

kshitijjoshi.142

Pro

Yes nuclear weapons should be banned as they cause widespread destruction are inaccurate, and leave the place destroyed for many years as people cannot stay there for over hundreds of years as radioactivity spreads which makes newborn children abnormal. They are born with certain cancers etc. some of them are mentally affected, do have proper growth etc. They also die at very young ages like 10 yrs., 12 years and so on
TheAwesomeRuler

Con

Well I should not say nuclear wepons should not be banned but I will say that nuclear wepons should be with the country in case it needs it for defence even if there is a label with banned on nuclear warheads some countries will posses them and this will be unfair so hereby it will be unfair for other countries thus nuclear wepons being banned is as good as not being banned
Debate Round No. 1
kshitijjoshi.142

Pro

@awesomeruler As u say they protect a country they also can bring crisis to it because if a nuclear weapon malfunctions it will automatically invite death as at last it is a kind of machine and machines can malfunction so if a country stocks them and by chance it malfunctions then the country will have to suffer. This will bring death, destruction and LOSS. As far as the defense of a country is concerned nowadays there many alternatives to nukes like nitroglycerin etc.
TheAwesomeRuler

Con

TheAwesomeRuler forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
kshitijjoshi.142

Pro

@awesome ruler what are your views regarding mine? you also did not reply.
As I said they bring in economical crisis and destruction.reply this time or i will win
TheAwesomeRuler

Con

TheAwesomeRuler forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by TheSlenderMan 3 years ago
TheSlenderMan
It's like the gun debate. If we ban nuclear weapons other counties will continue to make them....what happens when they have them to threaten us with and we have nothing? I don't advocate using them but if other counties have them we must keep on the same level...otherwise we will be like the bullied kids on the playground giving up our milk money.
Posted by littledude506 3 years ago
littledude506
Without nuclear weapons, there would be nothing preventing WW3 with us losing.
No votes have been placed for this debate.