The Instigator
youhavenoswag2
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
jackpogatchnik
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Should oatmeal be legal in cities without corn?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
youhavenoswag2
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/12/2013 Category: Health
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 595 times Debate No: 40383
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

youhavenoswag2

Pro

It should be legal, because without the oatmeal, cities will collapse under the political government of Corn made by Jerry Sandusky and large buildings without the Oatmeal/Corn base structure will begin to fall like dominoes. Not to mention the fact that the Pythagorean Theorem states that Oatmeal squared + Corn squared = a great economy and an outstanding political government. Also without Corn we must have some form of ready to eat food such as oatmeal, for example, Quaker brown sugar oatmeal. Finally, if you combined two great superpowers such as the Oatmeal and Corn, the powers of the United States would be limitless, granting us world domination.
jackpogatchnik

Con

It should be illegal because the Sandusky Rule states that the cat population needs to be equivalent or less than the corn production rate squared or the economy will crash. If our government shuts down again the corn production rate will decrease leading a fall in cat populations that will cause level 5 hurricanes because the weight of the cats is keeping the storms away. Also if oatmeal is allowed the United States will become too powerful and create a blackhole that will destroy the planet including our oatmeal supplies. Its too dangerous and its a lose lose situation.
Debate Round No. 1
youhavenoswag2

Pro

What you seem to be forgetting is the fact that, just like you and I, cats love Quaker brown sugar oatmeal (who doesn't). Without corn the cats will eat oatmeal, obviously, and if oatmeal is outlawed, the cats will be forced to eat everything they encounter, eventually destroying the world as we know it. It's not a lose lose, because the oatmeal not only keeps the cats at bay in corn-free cities, but also combines with the corn in the corn-friendly areas to create strong oatmeal-corn structures for buildings. Also, in Washington R.D, Baruck Obuma squares the oatmeal and corn to create his booming and "swagged out" economy. In conclusion, oatmeal is completely necessary in all cities, and creates a WIN WIN situation.
jackpogatchnik

Con

jackpogatchnik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
youhavenoswag2

Pro

youhavenoswag2 forfeited this round.
jackpogatchnik

Con

jackpogatchnik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
youhavenoswag2

Pro

youhavenoswag2 forfeited this round.
jackpogatchnik

Con

jackpogatchnik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
youhavenoswag2

Pro

youhavenoswag2 forfeited this round.
jackpogatchnik

Con

jackpogatchnik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by emil1 3 years ago
emil1
wow.... wow... meh
Posted by PotBelliedGeek 3 years ago
PotBelliedGeek
wait.... what is going on here?
Posted by Bender75 3 years ago
Bender75
Only unless infinite happens.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
youhavenoswag2jackpogatchnikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's got "swag." Seriously, though, Con resigned. Fun debate though!