The Instigator
Nerdgirl132
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
dylan160w
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Should parents be allowed to monitor their kids cell phones?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/21/2015 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 951 times Debate No: 68655
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

Nerdgirl132

Con

While I can understand the importance of a parent keeping tabs on their children, is it really okay to be able to sift through ever piece of information they have? Personally I don't truly approve of this, but I understand some people may feel differently? So is spying on their kids okay?
dylan160w

Pro

I accept the debate, since there isn't an outline on how you want the debate and there are only two other rounds, I'll just start with a BRIEF summary of my stance.

From a legal objective standpoint, parents monitoring their kids' cell phones are legal and within their means of being a parent. Nothing out of line. I understand we were all teenagers thinking parents have no place in our business; however, according to the law, under the age of 18, you are a juvenile and are under the custody of your parents. So regardless, they have legal authority over their children until they are 18 obviously.

From a moral standpoint, which is more subjective, parents also are likely to be the ones paying for the cell phone bill. So I do think they have some say as to what a child can or cannot do on their cellphone as long as they are providing a "privilege" to their kids and not an entitled necessity like food. More so, if they suspect their kids are maybe in danger or doing something illegal they have the right to intervene or monitor their activities. Of course, any good parent would inform their kids that they will be monitoring their usage rather than just outright snooping, maybe not to the rallying support of the teen. But I do believe kids have a right to be secure and not feel molested with rules, but regulating or monitoring a kids phones is at the discretion of the parent, and if the kid feels as though it isn't necessary or is violating his/her privacy, he/she should speak up, which may relieve the parent any worries and monitoring the phone anyways. This is families we are talking about, they can communicate with each other directly, this isn't indirect as the government and the people.
Debate Round No. 1
Nerdgirl132

Con

I will agree with you in the legal standpoint, because there you are right, and that wasn't exactly the point I was trying to make, as well as parent being informed of illegal activities in which their children may be taking part.

However, I don't really agree with a parent looking through a child's conversations with their friends, or other relatives. In many points a teen will vent to their friends through their texts or emails, and say things they don't really mean. In which case of a parent disapproving of said messages, but a parent does not need consent true enough. On some occasions someone who has no right to look through the phone at all, such as a friends parent or an administrator, then telling a parent of anything said person disapproves of. If the teen is caught in class with a phone then the teacher has the right to take and search it, but if the phone was found on grounds, as in falling out of a students pocket, then person has no right to look through the phone, or contact the parents of any findings that are within legal activity on the phone.
dylan160w

Pro

Ha ha I guess that makes two of us who don't really care about the topic, but it's still good nonetheless.

I guess saying that a kid will vent frustration to friends over the phone that the parents may not approve of isn't much of a monitoring issue, but obviously some dysfunctional aspects in the family. In that case, there are way too much personal and intricate details that an example just can't relate to. It is important for teens/kids and their parents to just speak their mind. I know my family did, we were loudmouths.

I also disagree, from a legal standpoint again, teachers do not have the authority to search a student's phone even in a classroom environment. Do they have the right to confiscate? Absolutely. Especially if it is a distraction in class. But to search one's phone, there has to be probable cause for the search that a student is committing a crime, from a constitutional point of view. And obviously, to search a person of anything pertaining to a crime, one has to be a cop or other federal agent. I know in some states and school districts that rule is probably manipulated so teachers can if they so desire... but what sane teacher would have the audacity to do such an embarrassing thing to a student that is technically, a stranger in their personal life? To me they probably shouldn't be a teacher if that is what they want to do. And if a person finds a phone on the ground, I do not think they should snoop around, but unlocking or using the phone to call a contact in the phone to inform them of the found phone is just in my eyes. But yes, they can't report illegal activities to a parent of anything found on the phone because that qualifies as an illegal search with no consent of the owner nor probable cause for the search in the first place.
Debate Round No. 2
Nerdgirl132

Con

Honestly I have no argument for that, because it is the point I was trying to make.....
dylan160w

Pro

dylan160w forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Nerdgirl132 2 years ago
Nerdgirl132
I would just like to mention I truly don't care about this topic in particular, I allows, my parent regular access to my phone, I had to make a debate from the con side for school! Feel free to prove me wrong at any time :).
No votes have been placed for this debate.