The Instigator
Saings_Nolls
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
KingofEverything
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Should people with blue hair be allowed to drink vanilla?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
KingofEverything
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/30/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 474 times Debate No: 83213
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)

 

Saings_Nolls

Pro

It is completely unconstitutional that someone should be prohibited from drinking vanilla. We need to evolve as a nation from this type of thing.
KingofEverything

Con

The resolution implies that they should drink all types of vanilla.

But they shouldn't. Some have too much sodium. They shouldn't eat all vanilla.

http://www.thedailymeal.com...
Debate Round No. 1
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by KingofEverything 1 year ago
KingofEverything
Thanks whiteflame. This is easily the worst vote I have ever received.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Evan_Of_Hearts// Mod action: Removed<

5 points to Pro (Arguments, Sources), 2 points to Con (Conduct, S&G). Reasons for voting decision: I have blue hair...

[*Reason for removal*] (1) The voter doesn"t explain any of their point allocations. (2) The voter clearly votes based solely on bias. The reality that the voter has blue hair should not affect the outcome of the debate. If the voter cannot separate themselves from their bias, then the voter should not post a vote.
************************************************************************
Posted by KingofEverything 1 year ago
KingofEverything
@Fox, it's a troll debate.
Posted by debatefox 1 year ago
debatefox
im so confused please explain why blue haired people cant have vinella or if this is all a joke just tell me
Posted by KingofEverything 1 year ago
KingofEverything
Done.
Posted by KingofEverything 1 year ago
KingofEverything
My argument would have been better if this wasn't 5 minutes.

P.S to anyone who thinks ice cream can't be drank, that's not true. I have down it before.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by EverlastingMoment 1 year ago
EverlastingMoment
Saings_NollsKingofEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: With both sides making assertions, Con was the only one to source his and hence his claims are more believable, the fact that the debate was only one round and Pro didn't have the ability to refute anything Con said it's easy to see that there is a clear winner.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 1 year ago
Balacafa
Saings_NollsKingofEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con showed that some people take in too much sodium from vanilla and used a reliable source. Pro, was unable to respond to cons argument because the debate was one round long. Pros argument coo soared of one assertion with regards to rights. This was not sourced or supported by arguments
Vote Placed by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
Saings_NollsKingofEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides made an assertion, only Con's was at all believable because he sourced it. Weak as the reasoning was that he was supporting, it was the only one that had any strength at all due to that support. Hence, I vote Con.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
Saings_NollsKingofEverythingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: While both sides had pretty basic arguments, Con's argument was better furthered along because they specifically explained the downsides of vanilla and provided a source to back it up. Pro's argument was weaker, because they only said it's unconstitutional. However they didn't give any reasoning as to why it is, they didn't quote the constitution or anything. Due to Con's argument being more detailed and specifically pointing out the downside to vanilla, I give this win to Con.