The Instigator
Swiggery_Semen101
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mockery
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Should porn websites be allowed to advertise on public television?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Mockery
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/27/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,816 times Debate No: 39527
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (17)
Votes (1)

 

Swiggery_Semen101

Pro

Yes, they should because everyone needs money, and advertising on television will make people want to spend money on porn. It's just life. Get used to it.
Mockery

Con

That's it? That's all?

Wow, wining this is going to be way too easy.

Firs off all, I have nothing against porn. However, it's important to remember that not everyone wants to watch porn. We have to accept that and therefore, keep it so people who don't want to see porn don't get it throw into their face. So no, we should not allow porn sites or magazine to advertise on public TV.

Secondly, the porn industry is booming and does not need extra help. Where are you getting your information anyways?

Last, kids should not be exposed to porn. Putting these ads on TV just increases the chance of kids getting in trouble and maybe even having problems as they get older.

Leave porn on the Internet and special channels.
Debate Round No. 1
Swiggery_Semen101

Pro

Alrighty,
You say not everyone wants to watch porn, so it shouldn't be thrown in their faces on television.
Not everyone wants to shop at Coles, why do Coles ads keep appearing on my television? They seem to be making a fair bit of money, they don't need ads to keep making profit.
Kids need porn. Seriously, they need a good source of vitamin D, if you know what I mean ;) aye, aye.
Nothing can take this argument down, it's too good, porn is a way of life.
Amen.
Mockery

Con

Oh my god

You are a moron.

Kids need porn? KIDS NEED PORN? Um, no they don't! Gosh, it's like talking to someone who is missing half their brain.

Kids do not need porn. And there is a huge difference between advertising for clothing and porn. Try again
Debate Round No. 2
Swiggery_Semen101

Pro

Swiggery_Semen101 forfeited this round.
Mockery

Con

Swiggery_Semen101 has forfeited. Not surprising.

I'm going to continue on the reason that kids don't need porn is because they can't understand porn. Kids don't really understand sex until their teen years. When they are young, they are focusing on having fun, not shacking up. Not to mention, showing porn to kids at a young age can ruin the image of women for little boys. Remember, kids imitate things. They might see a man hit a woman during sex and they might do the same.

The main point is that kids are not ready for sex. Their brains aren't developed enough. There are many other ways that prolonged porn viewing to children can harm them. ((http://www.protectkids.com...))

Again, porn isn't evil but it has no place on public TV.
Debate Round No. 3
Swiggery_Semen101

Pro

Swiggery_Semen101 forfeited this round.
Mockery

Con

Mockery forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Swiggery_Semen101

Pro

Swiggery_Semen101 forfeited this round.
Mockery

Con

Mockery forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
haha
Posted by TheOncomingStorm 3 years ago
TheOncomingStorm
Pro is clearly making a mockery of this.... See what I did there? Nope? Oh well....
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
Nah, no jokes. Pro knows what hes talking about:D
Posted by Mockery 3 years ago
Mockery
Stalin, are you joking with me or being serious?
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
Well...pro did have some strong arguments.
Posted by Mockery 3 years ago
Mockery
Honestly, I do want to but it's no fun if I'm not being challenged.
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
Yes!
Posted by Mockery 3 years ago
Mockery
Should I even continue this debate?
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
troll?
Posted by Jakeross6 3 years ago
Jakeross6
Y'all realize he's a troll?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Swiggery_Semen101MockeryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I was going to give con conduct because of the forfeit, but then she called her opponent a moron, so that is tied. Arguments to con because her arguments in 2 were not refuted, and they were backed by a source, which means sources to con.