Should private schools be abolished
Debate Rounds (3)
- Private schools allow children to actually learn, something you cannot always do in state schools due to the fact that private schools aren't for children that don't want to learn. Parents actually pay so that children can learn.
-Private schools save the government taxes. Private schools fund them selves by the parents paying for them.
Private schools are schools that parents pay for so that their child can learn. Private schools have not a lot of children in their class so the less children in the class the more each child gets to learn.
State schools are funded by the government. So children can easily get applied there, even children who do not want to be there. Private schools allow parents to pay for good education.
I disagree with your statement. Just because 1 student doesn't show the interest in learning it does not mean it effects the entire classroom. Teachers usually will have accommodations for those who are excelling in class, and for those who are struggling.
I also would like the brief that Private schools charge parents heavily on tutiton . Most parents are hit with numerous fees that only a high class family can afford. Why? because private schools must generate their own funding, which typically comes from a variety of sources: tuition; private grants; and fundraising from parents, alumni, and other community members.
Most public schools have programs these days like International Baccalaureate, which are designed for academically gifted schools. So parents don't have to send their kids to Private schools, because public schools already offer many different programs.
Private schools do have trips and program that children attending the school could go to.
Private schools also have no law that stops an untrained individual from being a teacher. You aren't guaranteed to have a qualified teacher in a classroom.
Better education cannot always come from programs, parents shouldn't be dependent on these things, when you can get the "full package" from private schools.You also made another point: "Private schools also have no law that stops an untrained individual from being a teacher. You aren't guaranteed to have a qualified teacher in a classroom." This could be the case but private schools are better than public schools so public schools are more likely to have an untrained teacher because private schools have more graduates.
"This could be the case but private schools are better than public schools so public schools are more likely to have an untrained teacher because private schools have more graduates". It is impossible that a public school has an untrained teacher. Why? because the law has certain requirements in which the individual much have, in order to apply for a job at the school in the first place.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.