The Instigator
Link123109
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
FAAL
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points

Should prostitution be illegal, while pomography is not?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
FAAL
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/21/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 366 times Debate No: 73846
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Link123109

Con

No, prostitution should not be illegal if pomography is not. They are literally the exact same thing, save for a camera. Pornography is defined as "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings." While prostitution is defined as "the practice or occupation of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment." Pornstars are people who actually do this for a living. They are "engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment." Pomography videos are prostitution.period. Therefore one should not be legal, while the other is not.
FAAL

Pro

Prostitution should be illegal because:
A.) It helps wide spread sexual transmitted diseases(STDs).
B.) It supports prostitution rings, human trafficking rings and crime in general.

Pornography on the other hands helps:
A.) Have a better understanding of how sex works.
B.) Relieve sexual tension
Debate Round No. 1
Link123109

Con

Link123109 forfeited this round.
FAAL

Pro

My opponent has forfeited, I will be waiting for a counter-argument.
Debate Round No. 2
Link123109

Con

Link123109 forfeited this round.
FAAL

Pro

Opponent has forfeited.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by phiLockeraptor 1 year ago
phiLockeraptor
Link123109FAALTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Such a shame. Con's opening arguments were convincing, but I'm not going to reward them for forfeiture. Pro wins by default.