The Instigator
drakie.bro
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
BearWithMe
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points

Should same sex marriage be aloud

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
BearWithMe
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/6/2015 Category: People
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 651 times Debate No: 74880
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)

 

drakie.bro

Con

Should same sex marriage be aloud NO. god made Adam and Eve not Adam and Aden. There is a reason why male and female are aloud to make life its because they were meant for each other. A man and a man cant have a child with each other and neither can a women so why should they be together this is why the world is getting so fucked up because people like this the people that are the same gender and want to be together.
BearWithMe

Pro

Meaning is subjective, and the Earth is overpopulated with too many people wanting important and limited resources, along with our disturbance of the natural balance of CO2 AKA carbon dioxide. There are plenty of children up for adoption.
Debate Round No. 1
drakie.bro

Con

Even though that is true why should it be aloud why would it be so great for same sex marriage its just the fact that its so weird it goes against everything in human life to do so its just so wrong to go against life and everything else.
BearWithMe

Pro

Why would it be so great? The reduction on overpopulation, and the fact that two adults who love each other are able to got married as another adult couple can.
I suppose you are saying weird as in unusual, but there are many who partake in this, and you just because something is unusual it does not therefor mean that it is wrong.
How does it go against life? Draining resources by the population having too many children does not promote sustainable life in the long run.
Debate Round No. 2
drakie.bro

Con

Even though that is true you still need to consider that if this does become a normal thing in life then how will the world repopulate. Yes now the world is over populated but what will happen when the world becomes under populated then what? How will the world grow back from things like that? The answer is for a man and a women to repopulate in order to keep balance. It's weird because a man is meant for a women and a women is meant for a man that why man and women have been together for so long, don't you want to know why man and women have been together for so long it's because they were meant for each other not because they were forced to. Like I said in the beginning of this debate, God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Aden.
BearWithMe

Pro

The world is far from underpopulated, the balance is not there. Over population is more of a worry than under population because it harms people that are alive more by taking away valuable resources while the survival of our species by continuation is just egotistic. I think you should worry more about the people that are already alive than the people that aren't. How would the world grow back? What? The world does not need us.

Like I said, meaning is subjective, and I don't know how a man is meant just for a woman and vica versa when there are many people that can grow strong affections for the same sex like myself. God didn't make anyone just as Unicorns don't make rainbows. You have the BOP to prove God even exists and made Adam and Eve. A written book AKA the Bible, is not evidence for the supernatural because it is not supernatural. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, anecdotes are not proper evidence.

People of the same sex have also been together for a long time, but it doesn't even matter how long people of whatever sex have been together as we have evolved as a species, or even if you don't believe in evolution we are beyond natural impulses and instincts to an extent and realize how antiquated and ineffective, even detrimental, they become in a civilized and well developed society. http://www.zo.utexas.edu...
Debate Round No. 3
drakie.bro

Con

drakie.bro forfeited this round.
BearWithMe

Pro

Con forfeits, no response.
Debate Round No. 4
drakie.bro

Con

drakie.bro forfeited this round.
BearWithMe

Pro

Con forfeits, no response.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Himans45 1 year ago
Himans45
Actually two women can have a kid...
Posted by BearWithMe 1 year ago
BearWithMe
and just because*
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
Learn to spell, smart phony. Allowed. C'mon teachers, do your freakin job!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by daem0n 1 year ago
daem0n
drakie.broBearWithMeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Con loses for forfeiting and for expressing his opinion as "the world is getting so fucked up". Spelling and grammar: Con makes NUMEROUS spelling, grammar, and word choice errors, most notably "aloud" instead of "allowed". Arguments: Con does not provide a persuasive case that God actually made Adam and Eve at all, which his case relies on. Pro actually describes an advantage of the option he advocates (limiting the population, as overpopulation is worse than underpopulation). Sources: only Pro cites any sources. Con did not even bother to cite the bible.