Should schools have summer assignments?
Debate Round Forfeited
Asriel_Dreemurr has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
|Voting Style:||Open||Point System:||7 Point|
|Updated:||1 month ago||Status:||Debating Period|
|Viewed:||245 times||Debate No:||95118|
Debate Rounds (3)
Summer Break: A period from 6 to 14 weeks of absence from school
Summer Assignments: Homework assignments, typically requiring a large amount of time to complete, assigned during the summer
Remembering academic information beats relaxation of summer break
According to www.onlinecollege.org,
While having a few months off for rest and relaxation might seem beneficial to students, it can actually have some serious consequences. The traditional long summer vacation often results in serious learning loss, something researchers have known for more than 100 years now. A century of study has shown that students routinely score lower on standardized tests at the end of summer vacation than they did just a few months earlier, with low-income and at-risk students seeing the biggest drops, the exact groups so many schools are trying so hard to push to have better test scores.
This also is a main cause of the Achievement gap between social classes. (Same Source)
Because students who are from low-income families have unequal access to summer learning opportunities, many fall behind in their studies and cannot keep up with their wealthier peers. While it might not seem that the summer months would have a big impact on students, it's estimated that as much as two-thirds of the achievement gap is the result of summer learning loss. As a result of these early losses, low-income youth are less likely to graduate from high school or to enter college.
Without Summer Learning and Summer Assignments there is nothing to prevent students to take a complete break, and while this may be nice, it can effect students for the rest of their lives. From a logical standpoint you must vote Pro. Con only encourages poverty, social divides, and stress later in life in order to have a little fun now. So do a little homework now during the summer in order to get one step closer to what you want in life, or spend the rest of your life paying the consequences. The choice is yours.
I will start with the Con position.
First of all, there is no evidence stated in the first Con speech, making the Con speech purely the opinion of a non-professional. Secondly, Con has provided no impacts of relaxation or of no work during the summer, so basically has yet to prove that the con side is better. This alone is enough to vote Pro as Pro is the status quo or the way things are now, and since changing has no benefit, there is no reason to change. Also, it would be abusive of Con to bring up factual evidence on this impact as it would be the last round of the debate. Finally for the Con side, in the first speech Con doesn't address why schools should not have summer assignments, it addresses that working during a vacation violates the definition of vacation, this is un-topical and shouldn't be considered.
On to the Pro Case:
My opponent first states that most school summer assignments consist of reading a novel. The Con has two problems with that, firstly that it's just a novel, its not difficult to complete over the summer, and its definitely not too vigorous that it would put a major dent into free time. The second problem with this claim is that there is no factual evidence behind this, just an assumption. Personally, I have Reading, Math, and History assignments over the summer, so to completely negate the people with more that just a novel with nothing more than an opinion is abuse as far as the Con case goes.
Finally, the Con case states that reading and writing outside of school would maintain its level of skill over the summer as its a skill we use everyday. This is completely false as it would increase the achievement gap. Every summer, low-income youth lose two to three months in reading while their higher-income peers make slight gains. While there are many reasons why this happens, one of the main reasons is that lower-income students have less interest in reading during free time than their peers. Enforcing summer reading would shorten the gap, even by a little bit, which is more than what the Con case is doing.
Reasons to Vote Pro:
Evidence is provided
Decreases Achievement Gap
Con makes too many assumptions, opinions, and at times is abusive
Con does nothing that the Pro doesn't
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click thelink at the top of the page.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.