The Instigator
Amyy
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
BonoboMoon
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points

Should songs containing bad language be banned evrywhere from young kids under 13?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
BonoboMoon
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2016 Category: Music
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 679 times Debate No: 85621
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (3)

 

Amyy

Con

Some words are just not suitable for kids
BonoboMoon

Pro

Songs containing bad language should not be universally banned for children under 13.

Parents or guardians, should be able to teach their children the meaning behind words that some people (I would assume you being one of those people) are uncomfortable with. A parent has the right to raise their children how they please. It shouldn't be illegal or banned if a parent wants to expose their child to a music genre labeled unsuitable by other non-related parents or people.
Debate Round No. 1
Amyy

Con

Amyy forfeited this round.
BonoboMoon

Pro

Why is 13 the age you picked? Instead of 10, 11, or 12?

Again I state that parents should be allowed to govern their children how they see fit
Debate Round No. 2
Amyy

Con

Amyy forfeited this round.
BonoboMoon

Pro

I think I win due to a lack of activity on your account
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by nba 1 year ago
nba
no
Posted by OnlineMissionary197 1 year ago
OnlineMissionary197
Well it would most certainly help with a child's moral development in life.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by jkyrocks123 1 year ago
jkyrocks123
AmyyBonoboMoonTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con kept of forfeiting so my vote goes to pro.
Vote Placed by Hayd 1 year ago
Hayd
AmyyBonoboMoonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit, conduct to Pro. Con says that some words aren't suitable for kids. Pro says that a parent should teach the meaning behind the words. This outweigh's Con's argument because kids are going to hear the words in life anyways, they might as well learn what they mean. Arguments to Pro then.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
AmyyBonoboMoonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture