The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Should tablets replace textbooks?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
EnglandAm3 has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/28/2016 Category: Education
Updated: 4 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 245 times Debate No: 96502
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)




I am completely against. This debate will have 5 rounds and each round with have one proof and as many as chosen sub proofs. What this means is that Proof, is a subjects and sub proofs are supporting arguments.
Please for serious debaters only.
1 st round i am explaining the rule and making sure that everything is okay.
Opponent please comment in round 1 slot if agreed and if you accept.


I accept the given rules for this debate
Debate Round No. 1


The First reason why Tablets should NOT replace textbooks is because the tablets can come with multiple problems. Think about it. Tablets can break freeze and crack and it sometimes cannot be restored. Textbooks yes are heavier but they are much more capable of learn than tablets.


Before I go into my main argument, I would like to bring a rebuttal to my opponents statement. He makes the claim that the reason why tablets should not replace textbooks is because they could break. To rebuttal my opponent's statement, I like to ask the question to my opponent that doesn't everything break once in a while? Even textbooks themselves can break if you tug on a page slightly to hard, to dropping it and it messing up the cover. Anything can break, and tablets themselves are not the only thing that does break. In fact, only 4% of tablets get damaged through cracks and bends stated by tablet analyst Brian Nadel. He put the top 4 tablets to the test through a series of vigorous tests in which none really failed (1).

The chances are clearly slim, and even if they happen to break, there are always replacement; which brings me to my main argument.

Tablet Marketing Strategy:
The reason why tablets should replace text books is because of helping the electronic economy boom in business. I consider myself a business republican with the idea of market prosperity, and expanding on the use of this technology can indeed promote both market and economic prosperity. In society nowadays, electronics are everywhere. From our phones to the computer we use to type this debate, technology is everywhere and tablets is one aspect. In the year 2016, the sales for tablets rose 300 million sales in the United States alone (2). Plus also technology itself in promoting a better economy (3). That's a high margin, and is increasing as the years go by. What does this mean? This means that the business is receiving more sales, meaning more funding in their own devices.

Think about it like this, you make a business which gives the best product out there. It's not perfect by no means, but it's a strong stand alone product. It does successfully but consumers want the next upgrade to that said product. As long as you have the money to fund for the next upgrade, you can achieve that goal. Giving funding to tablets allows a tablet's company to progress as a business, as well as make the product even better than before.

Referring back to my opponent's worry of tablet's breaking, if we fund for it better hardware can be implemented to the tablet. This has happened before, and will continue to happen as we fund for it. A good example would be the new IPhone where it recently began to become more water resistant. How was this achieved? By consumers for purchasing the product, and the same can be said about tablets.

Topic Clarity:
Before concluding my first argument, I like to mention to my opponent that this topic did not state on completely getting rid of textbooks, but hints at the idea of moving to an era of more technology. If the topic said "completely replace" then I would be on my opponent's position, but support the idea of moving our society to a more tech savvy based society.

Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by EnglandAm3 4 months ago
Sorry for the forfeit.... I would like to continue our debate. You are allowed to use materials from this debate. My computer was acting up and It was laggy. So I re-started it and by the time i got back the round was over sorry. You should be getting a notification soon. Sorry! :)
Posted by SnaxAttack 4 months ago
Sorry, i apologize. I just made a presumption. My bad
Posted by EnglandAm3 4 months ago
1st of all SnaxAttack I am a she not a he. :) just to get that strait
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.