The Instigator
LushDimbaugh
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
buckeyes3992
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Should the Browns trade for Michael Vick?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/4/2010 Category: Sports
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 606 times Debate No: 11092
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

LushDimbaugh

Pro

As we all know the Brown's have a need to fill at the quarterback position. The Philidelphia Eagles have an excess there, in that many people think the Eagles have three starting quarterbacks in Vick, Kolb, and ofcourse McNabb. The Browns could get Vick for likey a second or third rounder and then could better address other needs in the draft or free agency.
buckeyes3992

Con

Although Vick did show some promise, I still do not feel he is a good choice for the Browns. He is 29 years old and will turn 30 this year. He was never a very good passer and usually relied on his running ability. He will start losing speed and agility and his effectiveness with his greatest asset (his running ability) will certainly decrease like other prominent runners. Also, the Browns have started to show promise and the media distraction that would be Michael Vick would be a hindrance to the team. They have had an extremely disappointing search for a quarterback over the years, so one might see this as a great option. However, rather than continue this desperate search, the team should build a strong overall team with the plethora of draft picks this year and hold off on the quarterback. Most times part of the reason the quarterback failed was because of a lack of a team surrounding him. The Browns should hold off on Vick, because of the distraction and the fact that he is not a good option at this point.
Debate Round No. 1
LushDimbaugh

Pro

LushDimbaugh forfeited this round.
buckeyes3992

Con

buckeyes3992 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
LushDimbaugh

Pro

LushDimbaugh forfeited this round.
buckeyes3992

Con

buckeyes3992 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
LushDimbaughbuckeyes3992Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: FAIL DEBATE, as both sides dropped out... (checking the voting period debates, from Least To Most votes. By giving this one, it won't be prioritized in the system anymore.)