Should the Donald Trump wall be built on the US-Mexico Border?
Debate Rounds (4)
Only a fool would thinking keeping bad guys put will not make us safer.
And we could deploy the regular military to guard the wall, accomplishing such in the same legislation that created the wall. No problem.
I do not care how other countries see us, all of whom have much more strick immigration laws than the US.
And the wall will keep out anyone we do not want in who is coming from the south. Very simple.
https://www.census.gov...]. And who is the regular "regular military", you may need to read how laws work, because the Posse Comitatus Act makes it illegal to use those forces. The current wall is not guarded by US armed forces. You have not made a comment on the cost of the wall, and despite how ignorant you are on how diplomacy works, everyone in politics should care how the rest of the world views us. This is the only way that things get done on the national level. And the wall will not keep anyone else out, they will dig under the wall, or go over the wall. Those in prison do not have access to ladders, and most prisons are not 2000 miles long so not the same thing.
Mexico needs us a whole lot more than we need them. They will not even consider cutting off relations with us.
As I said, the Posse Comitatus Act can be amended to allow tropps to man the wall in the same leglislation that authorizes the building of the wall. No problem.
We can cut welfare to pay for the wall, easily.
And you cannot put seismic sensors under the wall to detect tunneling? ROFL
And only an arrogant fool would think another's disagreement with them makes the other ignorant. Grow up, mental midget.
Really those in federal prisons do not have friends with ladders? Who would have thought, the federal bureau is so stupid to build those tall walls that can be defeated by a ladder or a shovel. ROFL
Come on, man, stop and smell what you are shoveling.
And yes, illegals drive down wages and drive up the cost of welfare, both of which are bad. If you had some training in economics, you would get this. It will also reduce the number of future Libtard voters, keeping America from becoming the same 3rd word crap hole these people created for themselves south of the boarder.
And there is zero Mexico does for us that we cannot do for ourselves. Abolish welfare, and you will have millions of Americans willing to pick lettuce.
Of course, the fear mongers on the left preach doom and gloom, but it will never happen.
Cutting welfare is easy. Have you seen the deficit it created?
Guarding 1 mile is no different than guarding 2000 miles, it just takes more manpower. No problem.
And we monitor the entire Atlantic and Pacific oceans with acoustic sensors for sub activity. No problem. When we find those digging, we summarily execute them as invaders. After the first few dozen are shot, the rest will give up.
Landmines, another great idea for the wall.
And there are no defectors across the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea. But right now millions are crossing. If it trickels to 1-10 per year, I am cool with that.
You have made many claims, all of which are wrong or unsupported. You lose the debate. Go America.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Wylted 9 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con pointed out problems of a wall including ineffectiveness, diplomatic relations and violating the law if enforced by the military. You guys both just flung bare assertions at each other, so I have to cancel out arguments that answer each other. Pro and con disagreed with the effectiveness of the wall so that is thrown out. Pro mentioned an amendment in the law so the posse comitatus act does not hold up as a criticism to pro's plan. Con however did point out a negative impact on diplomatic relations by building the wall that was never answered. Also pro needed to argue why we should even bother keeping illegal aliens out, and he never made that argument. Arguments to Con
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.