The Instigator
Jaquavian1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
mistersilver
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Should the United States Attack Syria?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
mistersilver
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/30/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 880 times Debate No: 38321
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Jaquavian1

Pro

I honestly think the United States should attack Syria because Assad, the President of Syria lied saying he didn't use chemical weapons which he did. If we don't give them consequences other countries might think its okay to use chemical weapons and get away with it and the military will not doing anything.
mistersilver

Con

Currently Syria's chemical weapons have been funneled out of Syria and into Russia. U.S. This has led the U.S. to restrain from interfering with the Syrian war as a more peaceful resolution is being approached. If the U.S. attacks Syria then this would be show the world the unjust, pro-war,pro-death nature of the U.S. because there is a more peaceful resolution that involves less casualties. Also,If the U.S. decides to attack Syria then it would not be supported by civilians and some army men as the U.S. has recently come back from the war in Afghanistan. Due to low support/moral, and a more peaceful resolution, and the current diplomatic status of the U.S. it can be concluded the moment it would be foolish of the U.S. to aid Syria as this would strain diplomatic relations between the United States and Russia, and possibly cause a civil revolt in the United States.
Debate Round No. 1
Jaquavian1

Pro

Jaquavian1 forfeited this round.
mistersilver

Con

mistersilver forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Jaquavian1

Pro

Jaquavian1 forfeited this round.
mistersilver

Con

Pro has not provided a refutation or any other arguments and seems to have forfeited. Therefore, vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by bsh1 4 years ago
bsh1
Jaquavian1mistersilverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by NiqashMotawadi3 4 years ago
NiqashMotawadi3
Jaquavian1mistersilverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.