The Instigator
rileystephens
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
taburkasaurusrex
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points

Should the United States not import from foreign countries

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
taburkasaurusrex
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/16/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 499 times Debate No: 70150
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

taburkasaurusrex

Pro

First I'd like to thank you for putting this debate up. Second I'd like to say that what you are saying is unclear so I will wait until you explain before starting my side of the debate. Thank you again.
Debate Round No. 1
rileystephens

Con

rileystephens forfeited this round.
taburkasaurusrex

Pro

I'm not sure how the con wants this debated. I'm not sure I even understand what his first round means to the topic, so no further comment.
Debate Round No. 2
rileystephens

Con

rileystephens forfeited this round.
taburkasaurusrex

Pro

Still in the dark on what the con would like to be debating.
Debate Round No. 3
rileystephens

Con

rileystephens forfeited this round.
taburkasaurusrex

Pro

I think the U.S. should import from other countries, but I don't know how this debate is supposed to go.
Debate Round No. 4
rileystephens

Con

rileystephens forfeited this round.
taburkasaurusrex

Pro

The U.S. is better of importing from other countries as we're saving our resources and supplies while we buy theirs.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Russia_The_almighty 2 years ago
Russia_The_almighty
All con said was 1 word this entire debate.
Posted by TBR 2 years ago
TBR
Another Con//pro confusion. You should be pro if you don't want imports.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by chrisjachimiak 2 years ago
chrisjachimiak
rileystephenstaburkasaurusrexTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I think the resolution should read: The USA should not import for foreign countries. But Pro wins in every aspect.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
rileystephenstaburkasaurusrexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff, Pro accidentally argued the wrong side, so I can't give arguments.
Vote Placed by Hylian_3000 2 years ago
Hylian_3000
rileystephenstaburkasaurusrexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Mr.Chorlton 2 years ago
Mr.Chorlton
rileystephenstaburkasaurusrexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeiture.No attempt to even clarify what the debate is. All points to Pro. (whatever pro was for).