The Instigator
SteakKing
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
yanivmo
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Should the death penalty exist?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
yanivmo
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/2/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 344 times Debate No: 77212
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

SteakKing

Pro

Hello, I am looking to debate someone who believes the death penalty shouldn't exist.
yanivmo

Con

OK there is not alot to talk about the death penalty is A "EASY WAY OUT"

not for the victims or the thing who did the crime

{sorry for the ban en}
Debate Round No. 1
SteakKing

Pro

The death penalty should exist. It is not an "easy way out." If you kill someone, you deserve to be killed, too.
yanivmo

Con

If you kill someone, you deserve to be killed, too."

think about this this way. the death penalty make shour that he subject dosent feel hurt.
in the meanwhile the famaliy of the victim hurts .

killing the killer it not helping anythnig

we can use the people to build roads and stuff
and paying the famliy of the victim money every motnh

something like that to make society better!
Debate Round No. 2
SteakKing

Pro

SteakKing forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by SteakKing 1 year ago
SteakKing
Sorry, I forgot about this.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Emilrose 1 year ago
Emilrose
SteakKingyanivmoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by PatriotPerson 1 year ago
PatriotPerson
SteakKingyanivmoTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gets conduct because Pro forfeited, Pro gets S&G because Con made some embarrassing mistakes, for example spelling "sure" like "shour" and "family" like "famaliy". Arguments to Pro because Con spent the last round saying nothing but "ok" and he suggested paying the death penalty victim's family every month. What?
Vote Placed by salam.morcos 1 year ago
salam.morcos
SteakKingyanivmoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff