Should the military get cut?
Debate Rounds (3)
They should get shot instead.
Same to you.
Shooting is a more instant cause of death, thus will be a kinder way for them to be injured.
Since the military get to use guns, it's more fair to get to shoot them than have to dodge bullets to then cut them.
From a legal standpoint justifying cutting, will get self-harming prevention charities to protest and start riots whereas letting people shoot them actually will have gun rights activists in delighted celebration.
There is simply no way to refute this.
Military: the armed forces of a country. http://oxforddictionaries.com...
Shooting: To shoot.
Shoot: use a firearm with a specified degree of skill. http://oxforddictionaries.com...
1 make an opening, incision, or wound in (something) with a sharp-edged tool or object. http://oxforddictionaries.com...
Same definition, different source http://tinyurl.com...
2 divide into pieces with a knife or other sharp implement. http://oxforddictionaries.com...
3 to penetrate with or as if with a sharp-edged instrument or object. http://dictionary.reference.com...
4 todividewithorasifwithasharp-edgedinstrument. http://dictionary.reference.com...
Very terrible to do!
No new arguments allowed in last round, best of luck pro.
emmanelson forfeited this round.
IncredulousVessel forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.