Should the smoking age be raised to 21.
Debate Rounds (3)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: As a liberal, I'm going to try to view this as removed from my personal bias as much as possible. Pro basically argued that the deadliness of the toxins is too much for them to handle, and that teenagers do not understand the consequences. Con countered by saying that teens would rebel and do it illegally anyway. However, Con, in her last argument, concedes that "it's a good start", and then argues why it wouldn't be ideal. I think that because Con agreed, by saying that Pro's ideas were a good start, Pro wins arguments.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.