The Instigator
sabrinafinlay
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Lee001
Pro (for)
Winning
25 Points

Should the state execute dogs for biting someone?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Lee001
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/6/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 802 times Debate No: 71228
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

sabrinafinlay

Con

I don't think dogs should be executed for biting someone. Go to the URL www.teeenlink.com/opinion/current-events_politics/article/559964/Why-Now-that-is-a-question-to-ask/ . This article gives many good reasons. Also, Would you kill a cat for hissing at someone? No,you wouldn't,because it's not fair. It is their natural instinct to bite when they think they are in trouble.
Lee001

Pro

Thank you for starting this debate. My main point I will be exaggerating on is ( Biting dogs are harmful to society)

There are many dogs who may feel endangered when someone comes within their territory. Some may growl and hide and other dogs may decide to bite. It's up to the owners to train them not to bite and to control their animals while someone new is coming into their territory, if the dog bites, this can cause many diseases.

"Dogs have rounded teeth, and it is the pressure exerted by their jaws that can cause significant damage to the tissues under the skin, including bones, muscles, tendons, blood vessels, and nerves.

More than 30,000 victims of dog bites undergo reconstructive surgery each year, and 15-20 people die of dog bites yearly."

There is no way to train your dg not to bite, but just think if he bites one hes more likley to bite other's thus causing serious damage and maybe a lawsuit towards the owners.

source: http://www.medicinenet.com...
Debate Round No. 1
sabrinafinlay

Con

sabrinafinlay forfeited this round.
Lee001

Pro

Extend Argument.
Debate Round No. 2
sabrinafinlay

Con

sabrinafinlay forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
sabrinafinlay

Con

sabrinafinlay forfeited this round.
Lee001

Pro

Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 4
sabrinafinlay

Con

sabrinafinlay forfeited this round.
Lee001

Pro

Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Philocat 2 years ago
Philocat
sabrinafinlayLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
sabrinafinlayLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by CentristX 2 years ago
CentristX
sabrinafinlayLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture. Also, the Pro made better arguments.
Vote Placed by 2001bhu 2 years ago
2001bhu
sabrinafinlayLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF Pro had sources
Vote Placed by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 2 years ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
sabrinafinlayLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF.