The Instigator
BetterJono
Con (against)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
Cowboy0108
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points

Should there be a 3 debate completion requirement for voting/

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
Cowboy0108
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/8/2013 Category: Technology
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 603 times Debate No: 33445
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (6)

 

BetterJono

Con

NO they should not because in the United States freedom of speech is given to all citizens in the constitution as well as the right to vote.
Cowboy0108

Pro

Stupid reasoning of yours. The reason is so that the people no the importance of a debate before they play around and mess with the polls.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by GeekiTheGreat 3 years ago
GeekiTheGreat
Actually i am pretty sure the reason is so no one can quickly make another account to win a debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by GeekiTheGreat 3 years ago
GeekiTheGreat
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Stop doing one round debates.
Vote Placed by leojm 3 years ago
leojm
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: I think con did a a better job. This was hard to vote on because there is only one round. I didn't like the way Pro insulted Con. Con also has a point. I do agree with Pro on this debate. Because I had two round debates and they didn't work out the way I planned. But both of the debaters had good conduct.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Geeki stop votebombing.
Vote Placed by Walrus101 3 years ago
Walrus101
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Good point, anon. I still want these stupid 1 round debates to end. So I will tie this, for now.
Vote Placed by Anon_Y_Mous 3 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's only argument was incorrect. You have to wait eighteen years to vote- assuming you were born in the United States, that is.
Vote Placed by LotusNG 3 years ago
LotusNG
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Horrible debate, needed at least 2 rounds. Convincing to pro for using logic.