The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
4 Points

Should there be anymore pokemon fighters in smash?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/16/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 505 times Debate No: 75385
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




There should be more Pokemon fighters in smash. Some people have this idea where there will be no more because there are already 6 fighters, which means 6 pokemon in your party. Very dumb. Jigglypuff is the last to unlock in the 3ds version, and Mewtwo is a downloadable fighter. That theory is bombed so bad. Anyways, fans have been begging for Pichu. It's not a Pokemon that comes in a pokeball, so it's a sign for future fighters. and what about trainer?


It currently isn't a big deal for pokemon to be added; however, it will become a problem in later Smashes due the simple factor if dev time and resources.

In the Wii U version, 15 characters were added coming to a total of 49. Let's assume that only ten are added to the next Smash (being referred to as Smash2) and another ten after that (referred to as Smash3). This presents a challenge for Nintendo due to its lackluster amount of IP. Even in the U version, we're seeing the Wii Fit Trainer, Dark Pit, and Miis.

This means that the devs will have three options: release variants from current IP (eg. Paper Mario), add third party characters, or pull from lesser known IP (eg. XenoBlade, Animal Crossing, etc.), but the third option will cease to be viable eventually.

This brings us to the focus of my argument, the first option. What is the only IP that Ninetendo can pull from indefinitely? Pokemon. Assuming everything continues as it has been, all of Nintendo's current IP will eventually be sucked dry ("sucked dry" defined as creating redundant characters like making a Koopa Tropper a playable character) save for Pokemon and third parties. Yes it's possible to create new IP, but it's a risky thing to do on a regular basis. Nintendo hasn't exactly been creative in the past few decades anyways.

So, eventually, the only new characters will be pokemon or third parties meaning that Smash10 might have 10 new pokemon characters.

This eventuality will destroy the variety of Smash games as the roster will be filled with Pokemon.
Debate Round No. 1


TheMiiGroup forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


TheMiiGroup forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeits by Pro, so conduct to Con. Con refuted all of Pro's arguments from the 1st round, and noted that adding more Pokemon would ruin the game's variety, as there would be too many Pokemon. Pro forfeited the rest of the debate, so these arguments remained standing throughout the debate, so arguments to Con.