The Instigator
swagyolohipster
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ThePhysicist
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Should trolling be illegal in California?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
ThePhysicist
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/10/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 511 times Debate No: 42093
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

swagyolohipster

Pro

Everybody hates being trolled.
ThePhysicist

Con

I will argue in favor of the resolution that trolling should in fact be illegal legal.

Rebuttal:

"Everybody hates being trolled."

P1) That does not justify the claim.

Defense of P1:

The Government legislates laws based upon morality.

Trolling is not immoral.

Conclusion:

I eagerly await Pro's arguments. I hope this does not sadly end in a concession.
Debate Round No. 1
swagyolohipster

Pro

swagyolohipster forfeited this round.
ThePhysicist

Con

He has forfeited this particular round, but for obvious reasons:

- His account is closed.

Please vote me.
Debate Round No. 2
swagyolohipster

Pro

swagyolohipster forfeited this round.
ThePhysicist

Con

ThePhysicist forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
swagyolohipster

Pro

swagyolohipster forfeited this round.
ThePhysicist

Con

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 4
swagyolohipster

Pro

swagyolohipster forfeited this round.
ThePhysicist

Con

ThePhysicist forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Gs325jcbd 3 years ago
Gs325jcbd
swagyolohipsterThePhysicistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro FF.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
swagyolohipsterThePhysicistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro: you're very funny, trolling in an anti-troll round. The irony is too much. Sorry, though, I need to vote you down despite your truly artistic take on this debate.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
swagyolohipsterThePhysicistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited more times