The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Should trolls be temporarily banned from

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/3/2015 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 970 times Debate No: 79303
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (20)
Votes (1)




This debate is reserved for Tough. If anyone else accepts, they lose.

I'm for the idea that trolls should be temporarily banned from this site. I will be setting up my own criteria for "temporarily banning" them.

Temporary ban for trolling: 5 days.

Since "troll" is a slang term, we will be using the Urban Dictionary for terms like this.

Troll-"One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument."

Rules: No kritiks
No trolling
Round 1 is Acceptance
Do not get upset


Sorry, didn't mean to accept this. I may as well do it now that I have though because there is no going back and I can't reverse the past.
I believe that you need to lighten up. Fun never hurt anyone. If you don't like trollers then don't accept their debates. The world doesn't have to be so serious all the time. I myself agree that they can be annoying sometimes but I mean if you don't like it stop using the website. If you don't like it don't read the debate. If you don't lien it just ignore it. I also agree that it is sad however let people, do what they want, if they get banned then that's their problem let them suffer the consequences. It's good to have a little fun here and there. Lighten up.
Debate Round No. 1


Don't tell me to lighten up. This is my personal opinion. You are the one who should, as you can't tell me I should tolerate people getting angry with me. No need to be defensive here, it's my opinion.

Trollers can accept our debates too, and it gets annoying.

You have conceded, because you were never supposed to accep.t


Meh, I don't feel I have the energy to debate this pointless topic 😂
Debate Round No. 2


It doesn't matter. You have automatically lost.

Vote Pro.


Jess.hartley forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
20 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by CaptainMax 2 years ago
You should begin another topic of this. Some dude ruined it
Posted by Hawlucha 2 years ago
"One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument."

I disagree with that definition. That fits the seed metaphor to divide and conquer, not necessarily a trolling tactic. Dissent and internal conflict are psychological tactics used to create a rift inside one party. Trolling is just for the sake of personal amusement but lately the art's been besmirched and blocking is far easier than taking the bait.
Posted by ClashnBoom 2 years ago
1. You *can* challenge someone to debate. 2. Trolls *do* get banned by Airmax1227 for a week or more dependent on the damage. Just ask Airmax to ban them and ask Imabench cause his been banned alot 3. You should've chosen Imabench cause he will officially stop debating after a few more debates.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
You should've just challenged Tough if that's the only person you want to debate.
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
Posted by Tough 2 years ago
do i even get to debate
Posted by TubOLard 2 years ago
I love the hall monitor types who try to control everything on a dime-a-dozen forum. They are often the same neighbors and citizens who rat you out for petty civil code violations.
Posted by lol101 2 years ago
List of people who asked:
gokuFNAF2 (closed)

I'm going to give this to Tough.
Posted by sean_lasallian 2 years ago
Posted by imabench 2 years ago
As the top troll of the site and storied debater I would like to request this debate
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con loses by default.