Should trolls be temporarily banned from Debate.org?
Debate Rounds (3)
I'm for the idea that trolls should be temporarily banned from this site. I will be setting up my own criteria for "temporarily banning" them.
Temporary ban for trolling: 5 days.
Since "troll" is a slang term, we will be using the Urban Dictionary for terms like this.
Troll-"One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument."
Rules: No kritiks
Round 1 is Acceptance
Do not get upset
I believe that you need to lighten up. Fun never hurt anyone. If you don't like trollers then don't accept their debates. The world doesn't have to be so serious all the time. I myself agree that they can be annoying sometimes but I mean if you don't like it stop using the website. If you don't like it don't read the debate. If you don't lien it just ignore it. I also agree that it is sad however let people, do what they want, if they get banned then that's their problem let them suffer the consequences. It's good to have a little fun here and there. Lighten up.
Trollers can accept our debates too, and it gets annoying.
You have conceded, because you were never supposed to accep.t
Jess.hartley forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con loses by default.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.