The Instigator
phamminh
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
hiroki01
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Should we acquire different skills or focus on only one skill to success?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
hiroki01
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/16/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 602 times Debate No: 44061
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

phamminh

Pro

I strongly believe that we should obtain many skills to success because possessing many skill we are able to find more jobs in the market.
hiroki01

Con

I thank Pro for setting up this debate, and I look forward to an interesting and civil debate.

I am admittedly still torn on this question in reality, but for the purpose of this debate I will take "Con," and will argue for why we should focus on one skill for success.

I assume that the first round is primarily for acceptance, and I look forward to Pro's opening arguments in the next round.
Debate Round No. 1
phamminh

Pro

phamminh forfeited this round.
hiroki01

Con

I am not sure why Pro forfeited the last round. Nonetheless, I will provide an argument for why we should focus on one skill to succeed.

In the first round, Pro writes, “I strongly believe that we should obtain many skills to success because possessing many skill we are able to find more jobs in the market.” There are numerous yardsticks of success, and I presume Pro has in mind a stable career with a comfortable salary as his definition of success. It is surely true that someone who masters a range of different skills will (at least in theory) be in a good position to be considered for a range of various jobs and, statistically speaking, stands a higher chance of “succeeding” in his career. However, I will outline two reasons why this scenario is extremely unlikely and it is impractical for most people to be a generalist.

An important point Pro has not considered is that everyone is born different and, indeed, eventually succeeds in life in markedly different ways. In other words, we all have disparate proficiencies, aptitudes, talents, and interests. Some would eventually become scientists, some teachers, others musicians, real estate agents, cooks, or freelance photographers. Realistically, we need to admit that few people who are born to be polymaths like Leonardo da Vinci. As C.S. Lewis reminds us, "the greatest service we can do to education today is to teach fewer subjects. No one has time to do more than a very few things well before he is twenty, and when we force a boy to be a mediocrity in a dozen subjects, we destroy his standards, perhaps for life.” [1] Lewis is pointing out how it is almost always the case that the thinner we spread ourselves, the more likely we become the proverbial “jack of all trades, master of none.”

This leads us to another difficulty. It is clearly no coincidence that higher education today all around the world is offering increasingly specialized subjects, with technical and vocational schools also providing training in unique skill sets to gear trainees up for the job market. This gestures to the global shift over the last few decades where national economies have largely transformed from labour-intensive industries, to knowledge-based and other highly niche professions. Occupations such as forensic entomologists and aeronautical engineers require years and years of specialized training and expertise; IT associates and executives in the civil service are valued for their depth of relevant knowledge about the respective sectors. A targeted education is hence valuable for the specialized skills and knowledge that puts one in good stead for fulfulling the focused demands of today’s job market.

Sources:
[1] C.S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy.
Debate Round No. 2
phamminh

Pro

phamminh forfeited this round.
hiroki01

Con

Pro has forfeited again. Please extend all my arguments.

Thank you. Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by zmikecuber 3 years ago
zmikecuber
phamminhhiroki01Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: F/F. Not enough to decide on S/G. Surprised to see Con, who describes himself as an agnostic, quoting CS Lewis. Happy day.