The Instigator
Mr.WhaleKrill
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points
The Contender
beast664525
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Should we invest in the fad of Camouflage clothing?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Mr.WhaleKrill
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/15/2016 Category: Fashion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 354 times Debate No: 86641
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Mr.WhaleKrill

Pro

I am pro/for promoting the fad of Camouflage clothing due to the fact of financial reservation as well as forced-confrontation communication. I use the term, "forced" under the impression that most communication made by the impression of fashion is purely rhetorical/redundant and only opens up a person up to scrutiny if their own compliment or comment on another person's clothing was to or not to their liking; even in the scenario that a person only meant it as a distraction to bring about a more desired topic, I do not believe misdirection should be the initial impression in order to obtain one's true goal. If Camouflage clothing became a fad, for at least a decent few months/years, we would be as limited to use fashion sense as an ice-breaker as we are open to it; meaning, you can only truly comment on their clothing because it reminds you of something else (hence the definition of Camouflage) and even if it was misdirection, is was made on a slight of perception that no one can take offensive due to the original intent of camouflage clothing. This would result in an improvement of outward prejudgment as well as correction of inner self-prejudice due to the extra effort needed to filter out what you see versus what the camouflage is intended for.
beast664525

Con

Nobody likes camouflage stuff
Debate Round No. 1
Mr.WhaleKrill

Pro

How do you speak for a population without any sources? For all I know yours is just another opinion on a line of industry that is created from opinions. Please be more specific.
beast664525

Con

Camoflauge stuff is lame like your evidence
Debate Round No. 2
Mr.WhaleKrill

Pro

I proposed this debate under the idea of a concept as opposed to the evidence of a current occurrence which would negate my need for specific evidence. As for whether it is desired by public appeal or not also holds no merit since the whole thing is just an unproven concept.
beast664525

Con

You're such a nerd
Debate Round No. 3
Mr.WhaleKrill

Pro

Mr.WhaleKrill forfeited this round.
beast664525

Con

beast664525 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
Mr.WhaleKrillbeast664525Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's arguments were just one-line insults. Conduct goes to Pro.